| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrn101f6ed.57e.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Cap C-V test Date: 4 May 2025 16:46:05 GMT Lines: 27 Message-ID: <slrn101f6ed.57e.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern> References: <sik71k9uvbqacp964bvlc5317ga12gu9al@4ax.com> <vv6bc3$lohn$1@dont-email.me> <loid1kl3cb3c0m0hi5dvno24q5vk545gof@4ax.com> <slrn101ej5j.57e.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern> <sise1ktbgsfon557kkgmr6deh0lif9pepg@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net ivG7wiq0exNWzDfrSThROAwqGMvwZ5Rl/7aJD0VL/d2TAayeAN Cancel-Lock: sha1:DC2vpy1GfztJEdgGlK4wI/UPwBo= sha256:aOYmGOnMEpmpk2X3m2HRMGGwCvpgZgXX6exB+6uXXkQ= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Bytes: 1766 On 2025-05-04, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote: >> >>Not really - according to your measurements, at 25V, the caps should have >>about 1.46uF, so the series combination has 0.73uF instead of the 0.83uF of >>the parallel combination. > > One cap is .83 at 50 volts. Two in parallel would be 1.66. > The series pair is about .73 as you note. That assumes that the DC > voltage divides equally. Upps, yes. Must have been lack of coffee. > Ceramic cap nonlinearity is weird. To get the most C, is it always > better to pick the cap with the highest nameplate capacitance? Not sure. In one case where I needed about 9uF at 12V DC, standard X5R/X7R 22uF/25V all came out at about 7.5uF, and 22uF/35V were not a bit better. IIRC, X7S performed much better. Murata Simsurfing has typical Capacitance/DC bias curves for all their parts. cu Michael -- Some people have no respect of age unless it is bottled.