Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrn101f6ed.57e.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Cap C-V test
Date: 4 May 2025 16:46:05 GMT
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <slrn101f6ed.57e.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern>
References: <sik71k9uvbqacp964bvlc5317ga12gu9al@4ax.com>
 <vv6bc3$lohn$1@dont-email.me> <loid1kl3cb3c0m0hi5dvno24q5vk545gof@4ax.com>
 <slrn101ej5j.57e.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern>
 <sise1ktbgsfon557kkgmr6deh0lif9pepg@4ax.com>
X-Trace: individual.net ivG7wiq0exNWzDfrSThROAwqGMvwZ5Rl/7aJD0VL/d2TAayeAN
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DC2vpy1GfztJEdgGlK4wI/UPwBo= sha256:aOYmGOnMEpmpk2X3m2HRMGGwCvpgZgXX6exB+6uXXkQ=
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Bytes: 1766

On 2025-05-04, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>>
>>Not really - according to your measurements, at 25V, the caps should have
>>about 1.46uF, so the series combination has 0.73uF instead of the 0.83uF of
>>the parallel combination.
>
> One cap is .83 at 50 volts. Two in parallel would be 1.66.

> The series pair is about .73 as you note. That assumes that the DC
> voltage divides equally.

Upps, yes. Must have been lack of coffee.

> Ceramic cap nonlinearity is weird. To get the most C, is it always
> better to pick the cap with the highest nameplate capacitance?

Not sure.  In one case where I needed about 9uF at 12V DC, standard X5R/X7R
22uF/25V all came out at about 7.5uF, and 22uF/35V were not a bit better.

IIRC, X7S performed much better.

Murata Simsurfing has typical Capacitance/DC bias curves for all their parts.

cu
Michael
-- 
Some people have no respect of age unless it is bottled.