| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrn101nu7s.54eb.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 00:21:25 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <slrn101nu7s.54eb.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> References: <GJJSP.468$lbbb.283@fx18.iad> Injection-Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 02:21:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a631059208b07c0ee4527bde0c800718"; logging-data="1411682"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vCj+0aJmpC3q9LSnuP3YU" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:60tgBJXslJcLgFOkcF/R5PXXKXE= On 2025-05-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke > suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir > controversies. It looks like that changed. > ><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants> You also have to take into account where Canonical is located. In South Africa. That might have some effect on what's required of companies by the government. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.