Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrn1034elt.17m4h.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: FREE GAMES: "Deliver At All Cost", "Sifu" and "Gigapocalypse"
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 21:40:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <slrn1034elt.17m4h.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <v8eu2kdsdt0800isrlapmck7lhd5o96d81@4ax.com>
 <v6b13k9okpotmbhkpjk4od6s9e489p3ru4@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 23:40:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c2a324f06d8b9495d3017595e67d554";
	logging-data="998470"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+XM+oymZ5tYAKh5BHhxcG1L9zZyklKUcbzqaH/uhBDVg=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OJzbA7FBGEvviTW+isg0QXDv/LU=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 17:18 this Friday (GMT):
> On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:08:41 -0400, Spalls Hurgenson
><spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>* Deliver At All Cost
>>https://store.epicgames.com/en-US/p/deliver-at-all-costs-a30c8d
>
>
> I'm still amazed this game was given away for free. It's a brand new
> game, as in: it was released for the first time YESTERDAY. It's
> released on Steam yesterday. Except there you have to pay $30USD to
> play. And yet it's free on Epic for a week.
>
> It really comes across as a big 'fuck you' to Epic. "Yeah, sure,
> release this game for free on Epic. Maybe people will grab it there,
> but the ones who will actually play it -you know, the ones who would
> have bought it- will just turn around and buy it on Steam anyway.
> Because that's where people actually PLAY their games. Epic is just
> for Number-feeding."
>
> Is that what the devs intended when they made that deal with Epic?
> I've no idea. But it sure feels that way.


Probably going to be used as proof of how few people actually like Epic,
I think. "They literally gave away a quality game that released
yesterday, and people STILL preferred spending money with Steam!"
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom