Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrn103durm.q9d.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Distros specifically designed for children
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:03:02 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <slrn103durm.q9d.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
References: <100lcd7$30vat$1@dont-email.me>
 <m96s6gFrc9cU1@mid.individual.net> <100le5o$318dd$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ljn1$30vat$2@dont-email.me> <slrn1032jne.29j.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <6831b9a7$0$8595$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <slrn1035np2.84f.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <6832fab9$0$11442$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <10102st$1j2ov$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrn1038j7q.6c4.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <10131ao$28rgm$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrn103b9mg.9o3.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <opycnZUOkfVAF6v1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 14:03:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="231af6d6acfa70b0a52e5444b21475cc";
	logging-data="3402614"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190N37RmsvfKJPD3ooX167oloR71q1kISA="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uvvHLQzmBg/qmEhStoZVb5gwG5Y=

On 2025-05-28, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
> On 5/27/25 7:49 AM, Borax Man wrote:
>> On 2025-05-27, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 May 2025 11:14:02 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote:
>>>
>>>> We would have 1,000 distros without this mentality.
>>>
>>> Is that a good or a bad thing?
>> 
>> Do'h!, I meant we would NOT have 1,000 distros!  The fragementations
>> into different distros, different methods of packaging, different ways
>> of storing and configuring is overall, a hindrance.  Its a fake
>> "choice", because for the vast majority of people, who cares?
>> 
>> If there was only RPM, no Deb, would that matter?
>
>    Too MUCH 'choice' CAN be as bad as too LITTLE choice.
>
>    CURRENTLY - I think the Linux universe has become just
>    TOO diverse. More standardization would be a longer
>    term advantage.
>
>    Yea yea, everybody THINKS they have the Better Way,
>    but too often it's merely "different", no real
>    long-term advantage at all.
>
>    I like to play with Linux/BSD distros. Have seen
>    more and more 'diversity', but NOT 'improvement'.

The biggest improvements have been software and hardware related.
Better hardware support, and more supported software.  I can run Zoom,
Signal, Discord, Doom 2016 on Linux now.  Back when I started, I would
have to sometimes dual boot into Windows.  Now I don't need windows.  We
can thank Valve and software vendors who are relasing Linux binaries and
the Linux kernel team.  They made Linux a viable OS.  That and Pipewire,
etc.  Improvements are real.

Standardisation won't happen, not without a single authoritative Linux
OS.  Choice is not necessarily freedom.