| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrn103gkpr.19bc.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Distros specifically designed for children Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 12:29:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <slrn103gkpr.19bc.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> References: <100lcd7$30vat$1@dont-email.me> <m96s6gFrc9cU1@mid.individual.net> <100le5o$318dd$1@dont-email.me> <100ljn1$30vat$2@dont-email.me> <slrn1032jne.29j.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <6831b9a7$0$8595$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <slrn1035np2.84f.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <6832fab9$0$11442$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <slrn1038j39.6c4.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <10131kd$28rgm$2@dont-email.me> <slrn103b903.9o3.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <I8WdncM2d466G6v1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrn103du64.q9d.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <10184uj$3fruv$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:29:48 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3868451d3e2943d3d788e54123fb03ad"; logging-data="4047338"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/eQLfNLWRLopM5Y8DG3bqAH/hg2l2/7wY=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6PyY7o8Sv6vvByZYDkhGkkR4ZGw= On 2025-05-28, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Wed, 28 May 2025 11:51:32 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: > >> Linus isn't political, he's just pragmantic. > > Not sure what “pragmantic” is supposed to mean, but choosing the GPL as > his Free Software licence, has to be seen as a political act. > > After all, what purpose does the copyleft principle serve, if it is not > political? In Linus's own words, regarding the GPL > I really think the license has been one of the defining factors in the > success of Linux because it enforced that you have to give back, which > meant that the fragmentation has never been something that has been > viable from a technical standpoint. But Linus has, to me knowledge, never spoken about Linux as a means to drive social change, change peoples attitudes, to bring about social justice, or any of the other concerns that Social Justice Warriors have done. If you can find me evidence to the contrary, then bring it... But we have other organisations explicitely making statements about who is and isn't welcome, about what politics they support and reject.