| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrn104is6s.ueo.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What Window Manager/Desktop Environment do you use, and why? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 12:04:44 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 56 Message-ID: <slrn104is6s.ueo.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> References: <slrn1042rd9.14sa.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <F1SdncBow6jR9t_1nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <101tsvg$en0o$1@paganini.bofh.team> <slrn1045krt.21o1.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <6843417c$0$8575$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <slrn10478lo.8p2.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <20250609093835.0000784c@gmail.com> <1027nss$ptre$6@dont-email.me> <slrn104g20d.l1t.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <1029fb5$19mj3$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9f3274f3ef2e673a98559d8380af6591"; logging-data="2068886"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YeHPaIAwOzIlRLlkY4zRgVXwh2C7eOsE=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:V7MxfbF1kwpnEexQfKpooxX4sKU= On 2025-06-10, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 2025-06-09, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:38:35 -0700, John Ames wrote: >>> >>>> ... because they never stopped to consider that *nix users, unlike >>>> Windows users, aren't stuck with whatever nonsense gets handed down >>>> from on high by the Design Divas, ... >>> >>> Oh, I’m sure they considered that all right. Everybody with any experience >>> of Free Software can recall famous instances of project forks -- both ones >>> which ended well, and ones which didn’t. They’ve always known that those >>> who disagreed with some of their decisions could fork their code. >>> >>> It’s certain users (of whom we see too many examples right here on Usenet) >>> who don’t seem to appreciate this point. And who get continually surprised >>> when it is pointed out. >> >> I don't remember reading anything to that effect, but you might be right. >> >> There is now a fork of X.org called Xlibre, which I'm hoping will remain >> viable for some time to come. >> >> Nevertheless, the fact a project can be forked doesn't really negate the >> disruption when your DE or software suddenly changes on you. The >> attitudes of the developers still matter, and it is worthwhile to build >> your digital castles on lands maintained by those who share your >> philosophy. > > Indeed, the "ability to fork" does not negate the negative outcomes of > the original project "moving the controls around" and "given them new > pictures and names" with every 0.x release at the whim of the > "artists". > > The real world equivalent would be if one's car's UI completely changed > with each new model year. One year there is a steering wheel, on the > left, with the gearshift in the center console. The very next year > there's a pilot joystick instead of a steering wheel, and the shifter > is now a motorcycle style twist handle at the top of the joystick. The > third year you get "feet operated steering pedals" and "hand powered > brakes" via a center console lever, with the gearshift being a slide > lever embedded in the door, etc. > This is why you should consider the attitudes of the developers and their philosophy. If you decide to go with software maintained and developed by those who have a "move fast and break things" kind of attitude, you will have to accept, that things will move fast... and break. If the developers are opinionated, and have a "vision", then you are going to have to accept that they will impose their vision, and your experience will be as they think it should be. I value stability and consistency and self-empowerment, so I tend to go with software which is mature, doesn't really change and is, more or less, already in its groove. Software like Emacs, Mutt, FVWM, Claws-mail, Groff, urxvt and mpd.