| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrn105g3cl.3rmcc.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better)
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:10:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <slrn105g3cl.3rmcc.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <6oa35k5tfdfi6ng3hvghp4rm49u3pgnslq@4ax.com>
<102srpm$2m0jt$3@dont-email.me>
<4tt35kpjij4d1mco2u26t5bkm3f2c0cdsj@4ax.com>
<102t03p$2mtm4$5@dont-email.me>
<54845ktc5lspgu8g0ldv591l80m4kfbe1c@4ax.com>
<102tt8q$30vg8$1@dont-email.me>
<21k55k5ldt6icug604e5ruggnq49qlsp5a@4ax.com>
<102vjrl$3f091$2@dont-email.me>
<ccl65ktr0o80a0renhlhsm2thah1int1dn@4ax.com>
<102vpjc$3g5ra$1@dont-email.me>
<bms85kl9kv226g7b9810j51elsf3edftki@4ax.com> <1032ehi$8dj9$1@dont-email.me>
<qug95kd20774qsii65ioqt85vrs6f8aail@4ax.com> <1034s8j$amsq$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 16:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0c20ac70085e5a9785361077b427e278";
logging-data="610004"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/tbQzWPXLEnIDeKhZof+MG1knMxKXr5Hzw3w/uKZ9CTQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v65cdzUNNS+4CUtDZO24C0jHXLc=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
`~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 23:52 this Friday (GMT):
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 19:16:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:46:26 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:46:21 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> We use PADS. We've been using it since the DOS days when there was
>>>> basically nothing else.
>>>
>>> Seems like it’s still around, but it’s gone cloud-only.
>>
>> Not for us. We purchased six copies outright.
>
> Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
> unsupported software?
A lot of companies do, for one reason or another.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom