Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<slrnv0uhbt.inn.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Roots Culture: Free Software Vibrations Inna Babylon Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 00:34:18 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 1093 Message-ID: <slrnv0uhbt.inn.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5d734fe1906c97720a9cabb14560faf"; logging-data="1028223"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pKAehhSqO+KBW4sa+SSiaHG8Fd5csnng=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SkasLzMVJvf5WPJNEC6bOE/6ur0= Bytes: 61295 Roots Culture: Free Software Vibrations "inna Babylon" ====================================================== by Armin Medosch In this article I want to focus on free software as a culture. My first reason for doing so is to make it very clear that there is a difference between open source and free software, a difference that goes beyond the important distinction made by Richard Stallman. [1] His ideas have grown legs and now the notion of free software (with 'free' as in 'freedom') has been taken further in ways he could not have imagined. Second, I want to show that at least a specific part of the free software scene shows all the traits of a culture; this is understood by protagonists of the scene and is made explicit through the way they act. With software development rooted in culture, it becomes a discipline distinct from engineering, and is invested with social and cultural values. Rasta Roots and the 'Root' in Computing ======================================= The first part of the title, 'Roots Culture', is designed to resonate with the hacker pride of being 'root' on a Unix system, and with Rastafarian reggae 'roots' culture. In a file system, root is the uppermost directory, the one from where all other sub-directories originate. In Unix-style operating systems (including GNU/Linux), 'root' is also the name of the super-user account, the user who has all rights in all modes and who can set up and administrate other accounts. Roots reggae is a specific type of reggae music with heavy bass lines and African rhythmical influences. Roots reggae originated in Jamaica, and is closely associated with Rastafari. This is sometimes described as either a sect/religion, or a subculture, but neither of these definitions can fully do justice to the diversity of this phenomenon. Therefore it is better to follow Paul Gilroy who suggests that Rastafari be understood as a popular movement whose "language and symbols have been put to a broad and diverse use". [2] It originated in Jamaica in the 1930s, and took some inspiration from the black nationalism, PanAfricanism and Ethiopianism of Marcus Garvey. Through Rastafari, the African Caribbean working class found a way of fermenting resistance to the continued legacy of colonialism, racism and capitalist exploitation. It is eclectic and culturally hybrid, drawing from a range of influences such as African drumming styles, African traditions in agriculture, food and social organisation, [3] and American Black music styles such as R&B and soul. The central trope of the Rastafari narrative is that the Rastas are the 12th tribe of Judah, living in captivity in Babylon, and longing to go back to Africa, identified as a mythical Ethiopia. Paul Gilroy (borrowing a phrase from Edward Said) describes Rastas as an "interpretive community". The ideas and stories of Rastafari "brought philosophical and historical meaning to individual and collective action". [4] Through the enormous success of reggae as a form of popular music, particularly the work of Bob Marley and the Wailers, Rastafari became popular throughout the world in the 1970s; now, many non-Jamaicans sport Rasta hairstyles and dreadlocks, and dedicate themselves to the music and the activity of ganja smoking. In the UK, versions of Rasta culture now span all ages and ethnicities; [5] it is probably, by consensus, the most popular subculture in Britain today. Aspects of it have been heavily commercialised and roots reggae has therefore been unfashionable for a while. It has, however, made a strong comeback recently. The reason for this can only be that it is more than a music style or a fashion (not everybody with dreadlocks is a Rasta and not every Rasta wears 'dreads'): it is a culture in a true and deep sense (the meaning of which I will come back to later). 'Roots' influences can now be found in hip-hop, jungle, drum & bass, 2Step and other forms of contemporary urban music. Both notions, the 'roots' in computing and in Rastafari, are not to be understood in any literal or narrow meaning, but as points of association and affinity. Knotted together, the two narrations form a crucial potential point of departure for the radical social imaginary. [6] Neither Rastafari nor hacker cultures are without problems of their own. Rastafari, for instance, is a very male culture, where homophobia is rife and women suffer a subordinated role in the midst of a supposed liberation struggle. [7] I have chosen the Rastafari theme for a number of reasons. The main one is that it has developed a language of revolution which it uses to very effectively recount, judging from the massive reception it has got so far, stories about political resistance and the struggle for freedom, peace and justice. These accounts have resonated far beyond Jamaica and the urban African Caribbean communities in the US and Britain. Roots reggae, as music and as a liberatory mythmaking machine, has a huge influence in Africa and Latin America. Rastafari lends itself to be adopted by other communities and cultures due to its eclectic and hybrid nature. The experience of diaspora, central to the Rastafari story, is shared by many people who feel displaced and uprooted. This is understood well by some of the musical protagonists of roots music, who encourage 'togetherness' of all people who feel alienated in the societies where they live. In the words of Humble Lion from the Aba Shanti Sound System from south London: "Ultimately, people who are like us, who hold similar attitudes, will gravitate towards us, because we are aiming for the same virtues that they are, and this creates a something a lot better than what society stands for. Right now, it's obvious that our societies are controlled by money, polarised, xenophobic. The major world powers back their puppet leaders and the media sanitises, separates 'spectators' from reality. [...] I have to say that now it is not only the black youths who are suffering in this land, so to me, increasingly, the true inner meaning of Rasta is not concerned with colour". [8] Hackers, young and old, have their own reasons to feel alienated in society, one of which is the misrepresentation of their creed in the media. Originally 'hacking' meant nothing else but feeling impassioned about writing software to the extent of pursuing this interest sometimes outside the norms, which would not necessarily imply anything illegal. The original 'hackers' such as Richard Stallman were employees of research institutions like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) anyway, so they could hardly be seen as being outside the state system. But during the 1980s, in the course of the boom in computer science research (sponsored by the military pursuing projects such as Strategic Missile Defense and Artificial Intelligence), [9] the mood in these research ivory towers, which had been fairly liberal in the 1970s, changed. Mavericks like Stallman left, and hackers outside the state-sanctioned system were increasingly perceived as a potential threat to national security. From the mid-1980s onwards, secret services and other law enforcement agencies started their 'war against hacking', with a compliant mass media doing their best to stigmatise hackers as criminals, or even as terrorists. [10] With the mass adoption of the Internet in the 1990s, a new breed of hacker emerged, so-called 'script kiddies', who did not have to develop deep knowledge of computers because hacking tools had become relatively easily obtainable. Script kiddies, not considered 'real' hackers but instead called 'crackers', have developed an obsession with breaking into web servers, obtaining 'root' privileges and inscribing digital graffiti on the web server's homepage. This activity served as legitimation for the strengthening of the legal regime, and allowed centrally owned mass media to continue, in full force, their denouncement of computer subcultures in general. Welcome to Babylon! Hacker Ethics ============= I do not want to enter into a discussion here of what 'true' hackers are, especially since the factional infighting between hackers sometimes rages over topics such as which 'free' version of BSD is the better or 'truer' one, which seems rather pointless to the noninitiated. [11] Nevertheless, a common theme can be identified that transcends internal schisms in the hacker community. Most hackers share an ethical code in relation to computers and networks. Central to this ethical code is that hackers do not disrupt the flow of information and do not destroy data. It is not my intention to idealise hackers as freedom fighters of the information age, but it must be said that their ethics stand in marked contrast to the behaviour of the state and certain industries who do their best to erect barriers, disrupt communication flows and enclose data by various means, including threats of breaking into the computers of users who participate in file-sharing networks. This hacker ethic has been a shared commitment to a 'live and let live principle'. It is an ethos that is born out of love for the craft of hacking and the desire to let as many people as possible benefit from the sources of knowledge. Hackers do not represent one homogenous community; they are split and divided into many subgroups, but are united in that for them hacking is more than just writing code. It is a way of life, it has its own politics and it has many characteristics of a culture. Hacker culture has developed its own ways of speaking, certain types of 'geek' humour, and even some sort of a dress code. Hackers regularly meet at conventions (some highly publicised, some more subterranean) with an atmosphere more resembling a picnic of a large family or a tribe than any sort of formal 'meeting'. From this point of view, there are similarities between hackers and Rastafari. The Hijacking of Free Software ============================== As Ur-hacker Richard Stallman makes clear whenever he speaks in public, there is not much difference between 'open source' and 'free' software in the way the software is developed technically. Most free and open source software packages are also protected by the same licence, the General Public Licence (GPL) developed by Stallman with the support of Columbia University law professor Eben Moglen. Yet, according to Stallman, there is a profound difference insofar that 'free' software is linked with a political concept of freedom centred on freedom of speech. The term 'open source' was introduced by a group of probusiness computer libertarians in direct opposition to this political position. Eric Raymond and others proposed the use of the term 'open source' to make the idea of releasing source code and developing software collaboratively more appealing to American IT investors. This move by the proponents of open source was ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========