Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: oldernow <oldernow@dev.null>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: If you believe in the potential of the AI ecosystem as it stands,
 you're at least as stupid as AI
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:41:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <slrnv10hfl.647.oldernow@oldernow.jethrick.com>
Reply-To: xyz001@nym.hush.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:41:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d77aadaed114ea35f63a56af60201856";
	logging-data="1629496"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dX4aGHXki6ZwfszhZkSMoJy8cq6K3td0="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lDRLgrNMBINuhbeRYIiu9rLEyoA=
Bytes: 1965

AI must fail because its overall ecosystem promotes information
incest.

What began with input from genuinely intelligent beings describing
their experiences as biological beings is processed in accord
with "statistical large language analysis" algorithms, and
ejaculated/vomited/shitted back into the same information pond,
*necessarily* being less valuable that that acquired from the
previous information gathering round for not being rooted in actual,
biological living experience.

Subsequent mining of information from that pond implies gathering
"information" *increasingly* less based upon the experience of
actually living.

At this point one would normally write "rinse and repeat", except
in this case the "rinse" is actually a dirtying.

My statistical analysis has concluded that the chance of the ultimate
result being other than information birth defects giving rise to
even more information birth defects - again, from the perspective
of actual, biological living beings - is precisely zero.

-- 
oldernow
xyz001 at nym.hush.com