Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<slrnv32n6i.36c.jj@iridium.wf32df> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:04:18 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <slrnv32n6i.36c.jj@iridium.wf32df> References: <slrnv303gc.d4e.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> <v0piap$22peg$1@dont-email.me> <slrnv30pcm.7h2.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> <v0rh13$2l6nk$1@dont-email.me> <v0rjs0$2lnd6$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 23:04:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1622beacb6f48cb0c7ab0d7382ae3273"; logging-data="2833775"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IGCI1L7bCExxKiETG4JC/twej1tc356g=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mt6IPRq3IoaVd+S+AvOZtSYUhwg= Bytes: 1582 On 2024-04-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:32:48 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > >> I read the tech manual and >> decided the IBM 3270 was a piece of junk. The protocol to talk to the >> thing was ridiculously complicated. > > True of a lot of IBM technology, is my impression. Note that their idea of > a networking architecture, SNA, did not actually support peer-to-peer > connections until about the mid-1980s. Ahhh... Memories. SNA should not 'appen