Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: cpu-x
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 22:40:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <slrnv525l2.9e6.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <v1b791$2ln8f$2@dont-email.me>
 <ib8i3jpsn8qgcsl4l3a5lin9lan9men5t1@4ax.com>
 <66394366$0$3711192$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <cbii3j13d49ngqdtc8gpr1shnfc4oreapk@4ax.com>
 <663b9bdb$0$7066$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <la2k4sF9u11U1@mid.individual.net>
 <6648c3e3$0$2422120$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <phkh4jtch981ukie6rqjrhfhhne2iii4m7@4ax.com> <v2bk44$31t1f$2@dont-email.me>
 <65vj4jt2eu9iv148ivrj7imip1056bni4v@4ax.com>
 <slrnv51ko5.2fu.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <6kl15j1jnr0gmd5e3tfu07nu6uqjsl7e78@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 00:40:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9757aa7b38993eaf0cba5a2f7ce0be96";
	logging-data="2665216"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BZuXvL055tXDEyNH4C1/37nXFuUnbz97KpfuwaAbbIg=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c1d9qCHemkwc9ncjxsDEhQ6uB2Q=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2874

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 18:07 this Friday (GMT):
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> wrote:
>
>>>>> Audacious is really
>>>>> better than Winamp, etc.
>>>>
>>>>Yeah, I'm using audacious right now!
>>>
>>> I always loved Winamp, and it is a great app, but there are some
>>> things about Audacious that are really cool, the idea that one gives
>>> up so much with Linux just doesn't really pan out.  M$ Office was
>>> never so great to me, when I found out about OO a little over 20 years
>>> ago, I never looked back (and then LO became the current project).
>>
>>Yeah, Audacious has a nice UI and some features are great. I also
>>happened to use OO on a windows computer for a while before jumping
>>over.
>
>
> Winamp and Microsoft Office might be the mainstream, but that doesn't
> mean they're actually better to use.  Just as Winblows as an OS isn't
> necessarily the best.  I'm not interested in using it, although I do
> have Edge and Skype for Linux installed, it's not like I'm anti-M$, I
> just want a system that functions the best way, and Mint is ideal for
> that.


Yeah.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom