Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking,talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.usa,talk.politics.guns,alt.food.fast-food,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America
 Apart
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 01:18:41 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 101
Message-ID: <slrnv52f3h.3p1.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
References: <fit15jhfpi1ok222cg0u66b82e8fabm0cm@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 03:18:42 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6e0e54e7eaaf59f3eb53c4a372cea6ad";
	logging-data="2706978"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wP+6LZAQgeWxnSnxE3VWcX5t/PM34Z3c="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:52PwKVD1HVrZiW0N6voHN6qbl2Y=
Bytes: 6561

["Followup-To:" header set to talk.politics.misc.]
On 2024-05-24, NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:
> https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/
>
> Conclusion
>
> As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today “suffer from downward
> economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and
> depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false
> presumption of privilege.” Any vestigial advantages they may still
> derive from belonging to America’s historical majority are “informal
> and evanescent cultural legacies,” whereas “the discrimination they
> experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal.”
>
> Obviously, if there were any real “white privilege,” non-whites would
> be trying to “pass” for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a
> flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned
> from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any
> explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style
> claims aimed at getting non-white privilege.
>
> Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of
> anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He
> combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these
> white progressives, writing that their “moral mania has made them,
> without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real
> solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject
> their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of
> power and authority.”
>
> The endgame of the current system is “the expropriation of land,
> property, and other wealth from whites” and the institution of “a
> permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination.”
> As of now, he writes, “appeals to expropriation are usually indirect,”
> but over time they “will become more direct and in need of less
> justification as the political power of white Americans continues to
> decline.”
>
> Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of
> the reparations movement:
>
> Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar
> payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We
> aren’t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by
> compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this
> but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept
> of mass racial reparations.
>
> The alternative is likely to be “racial extortion on an unimaginable
> scale,” possibly leading to “interethnic violence and a collapse of
> American society.”
>
> The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land
> acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to
> “acknowledge” that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As
> the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually
> incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied
> were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land
> acknowledgement might sound something like: “Our ancestors took this
> land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to
> another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee,” etc.,
> etc. More importantly, such “acknowledgements” are “an intellectual
> precursor to expropriation,” and deserve to be taken seriously as
> such.
>
> Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected
> Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that “a non-white
> ought to write such a book instead of him.”
>
> Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be
> treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It’s an understandable political
> instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in
> recent decades, but ultimately it’s an attitude we need to eliminate.
>
> It is whites’ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that
> had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes,
> “non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites
> have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights” that
> have proven “almost completely ineffective.” It is time for us to make
> strong demands.
>
> As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of
> anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get
> the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream
> book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years
> ago that pulls so few punches.
>
>
>  The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America
> Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages,
>

Its amusing to see people finally realise that anti-racism has an
anti-white component to it, given that people were talking about this
(albeit a very small minority) decades ago.

Identity politics is here to say.  You cannot have a "diverse" society
without identity politics.  White people do not have a choice whether
to engage or not, their choice is, are they going to stand for their
own group interests or abandon their group interests and slide
backwards.  Anti-racists are arguing that whites should do the latter.