Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Subject: Re: (Sumatra PDF viewer) -- " I prefer Okular." -- viewer for .doc
 files?
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:05:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <slrnv6l2r0.24pu.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <v3df9h$2d2u0$1@dont-email.me> <v3dpun$2epqd$4@dont-email.me>
 <v457ju$3pmpo$3@dont-email.me> <v45aob$3rcpa$4@dont-email.me>
 <v45cmt$6u4$1@panix2.panix.com> <v45h7j$3tk4v$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv6f5cc.2hg.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v48osg$thjj$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv6ifgs.13pi.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v4bk9s$1i8bg$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:05:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c464b488a5de1d3dcb3d85cc58e2c0d";
	logging-data="2246378"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cPvpmQMN1Tv4sFXp4FxTvG+2BLpZuZPUaoJVpuZR3qQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S7am7y/bvD5MmYfoRCy/uqNgpSM=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2785

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 07:55 this Wednesday (GMT):
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:25:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 05:55 this Tuesday (GMT):
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 02:40:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>>
>>>> And they made it even more confusing by introducing .docx too.
>>>
>>> That’s a whole new format, which Microsoft has tried to railroad
>>> through as some kind of “international standard” (ISO 29500). Except
>>> the specification document is so opaque and incomprehensible, nobody
>>> can be sure when they’ve implemented it properly or not. So
>>> “compatibility” falls back to meaning “compatible with Microsoft
>>> Office”, not “conforming to an official spec”.
>>>
>>> Stick to ODF, aka ISO 26300. It’s only a small fraction of the
>>> complexity, and much easier to get right.
>> 
>> Why not just use .rtf or .md? Those are way more universal imo.
>
> You mean Markdown? Sure, it’s nice and simple, but has no stylesheets.


Stylesheets?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom