Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrnv7kntp.f29.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: CRAP Poll: Does The Tech Still Impress?
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:20:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <slrnv7kntp.f29.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <kqtg7jh9p9j25hsclqaggsmpv15i9b8v4f@4ax.com>
 <ldstt5FfskcU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2837c1d5b04960403d7af42939d017de";
	logging-data="1518436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+i1OBBuL3JeDWw8Rj/Z9nAaZMA9S3VwFOAS+9oYJYKcA=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:D6jLIGpDcQTuM7QRsGHNihyRubU=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 3246

Mandrake <prmandrake0@gmail.com> wrote at 09:51 this Monday (GMT):
> Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
>> 
>> So this CRAP* poll is ever-so-slightly less random and pointless this
>> time. I mean, not /much/ less; it's just enough less CRAP that I'm not
>> going to be giving you the usual silly options. Yup, this time you
>> can't just pick from A, B or C; you gotta WRITE out your response. You
>> might even have to think about it first!
>> 
>> 
>> (Obviously, I expect many fewer responses this time** ;-)
>> 
>> 
>> Anyway, here's the question for this month's poll. It's about tech in
>> video games. Specifically:
>> 
>> Does the technology in games impress you anymore?
>> 
>> And by 'tech', I mean anything from graphics, physics, world-size, AI;
>> stuff like that. The underlying software and hardware that powers our
>> games. When you load up a new game, is any of that still making you
>> go, 'Wow! I didn't know PCs could do that" or "Hey, that's really
>> neat"? If so, which games? If not, can you remember the last time that
>> happened?
>
> I've been asking myself the same thing quite a bit lately.  However, I 
> do have an example that impressed me.  Recently Ubisoft remastered and 
> re-released Heroes of Might and Magic III.  It's one of my favorite 
> games and only recently did developers begin taking remastering 
> seriously.  That's not what impressed me.  I switched over from that to 
> Heroes of Might and Magic V and took a good look at the game.  The 
> graphics are beautiful.  The music is high quality too.  No longer 
> taking Heroes V for granted.  Set the camera to classic view and 
> pincushion the enemy as Marksmen...
>
> What I think is missing from games today is the cartoon feel.  All those 
> high resolution monsters with fuzzy and often erroneous graphics. 
> They're rough like a hooker without makeup.  Not my cup of tea.  They 
> seem cultish and anathemic.


So like indie games?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom