Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!inka.de!mips.inka.de!.POSTED.localhost!not-for-mail
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Nebula Finalists 1990
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:18:38 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnv86apu.1d6k.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References: <v5ueok$4eg$1@reader1.panix.com> <v5uq9e$168of$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5uu25$ber$1@reader1.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:18:38 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: lorvorc.mips.inka.de; posting-host="localhost:::1";
	logging-data="47409"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@mips.inka.de"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Bytes: 1232
Lines: 10

On 2024-07-01, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:

> Welllll, there's a set of SF authors with whose flaws I am intimately
> familiar because I read and reread and reread so much of their stuff
> because their virtues outweighed their flaws. Poul Anderson might be 
> the example whose works I own the most of, because he was so prolific.

Now I'm curious: What are Anderson's characteristic flaws?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de