Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: There he goes again
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:30:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <slrnv9aj96.5m6.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <v69its$3dons$1@dont-email.me> <sG6s8v.B6nB@yahoo.com>
 <v6ar7b$3ngh6$2@dont-email.me> <v6ci5t$oq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6cr5s$1kfb$1@dont-email.me> <leug5rFgsj3U2@mid.individual.net>
 <v6d3qp$6ida$1@dont-email.me> <lf0rmsFmm0pU7@mid.individual.net>
 <v6ht4l$12f54$8@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv8p1p9.4ef.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <lf3p0dFd7obU1@mid.individual.net>
 <slrnv8t383.2rf6.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <lf83t6F2jubU4@mid.individual.net> <lf8dm1F3j7qU1@mid.individual.net>
 <slrnv958hb.3tc.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <lffvq3F8h1fU3@mid.individual.net> <v6va8b$3r1am$6@dont-email.me>
 <lfh2evFdhd3U3@mid.individual.net> <v6voc0$10rb$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv97uke.497.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <lfiqciFl1raU6@mid.individual.net> <v71tjb$cpvf$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:30:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b42bff0b8a2cd620f8ea98bf37d377e";
	logging-data="823097"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191tZM7L5U8HLcY5Nd6ACgGUljsXOwSfdj8UUSto6fXpQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IMh1mvb8/ptK1SNTDkjVyQvVY7Q=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2728

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 01:21 this Monday (GMT):
> On 14 Jul 2024 20:22:42 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:20:07 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>> 
>>> Yeah, isn't there a legal thing where like if a name becomes part of
>>> common vocabulary, then you lose the trademark?
>> 
>> Very seldom happens if you keep defending the trademark.
>
> You have to keep insisting that people stop using the trademark as a 
> generic term. Sometimes it’s an unwinnable campaign.


I'm pretty sure Google and Photoshop are close to generic terms at this
point.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom