Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI
 (artificial intelligence)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 05:50:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <slrnvajjl3.3e0ab.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <v7g5qf$3gjh2$4@dont-email.me> <v7hga4$3oaep$1@dont-email.me>
 <645882704.743219657.314271.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91675b819fee9c04573935554ec98113";
	logging-data="1547984"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//FxB3eB/q7MNFD8kOrJ+nu6R5dpJ4sGMgIo9YtvviCw=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YRi4tVUl93YEiFceD79eDGt4Zww=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2957

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote at 02:01 this Sunday (GMT):
> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-07-20 11:07:59 +0000, -hh said:
>> 
>>> On 7/19/24 11:09 PM, Andrew wrote:
>>>> "Meanwhile, all of those benefits are available on Android and have been
>>>> since Google introduced the idea of an AI-first smartphone in October 2024
>>>> during the Pixel 8 launch. With Google's Pixel 9 family due to be announced
>>>> in August, Apple's iPhone will be two generations behind Android's AI
>>>> efforts before it has even left the Cupertino stage."
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2024/07/18/apple-iphone-16-pro-max-apple-intelligence-ai-sales-demand-new-iphone/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> What do you expect from a company whose advertising budget dwarfs R&D.
>>> 
>>> But how does it actually matter how far someone is "behind" when the 
>>> shiny new widget still isn't all that great, and doesn't actually 
>>> reliably provide meaningful productivity gains?
>>> uttinf 
>>> Case in point, AI asked to render salmon swimming upstream:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/yijd3c/they_asked_an_ai_engine_to_recreate_a_salmon/>
>>> 
>>
>> 
>> Ignoring the fact that AI is utterly useless and nothing more than 
>> another fad  gimmick ... 
>
> Well, it may be a fad .. or perhaps not (at least for certain niches).
> Real point is that it is still formative and immature today.
[snip]

Yeah, I personally dislike AI.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom