Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net>
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gemini
Subject: Re: hamradio/satellite
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:46:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <slrnvbu7uo.28a.dan@djph.net>
References: <v7bm3n$l9k4$2@matrix.hispagatos.org>
 <slrnv9j4ok.nch.dan@djph.net> <v9knk1$s9g$1@news.chmurka.net>
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:46:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8f9e96e0e3f07eedfbf93a1ecf28451";
	logging-data="1477068"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8dbnR+ix8Tl6aFs7VjrqnFE3VdmgRK5M="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:daV4lFLo4dcnkLEUfGPlMX4eKvo=
Bytes: 1431

On 2024-08-15, Emil Tomczyk wrote:
>> It'd be questionable at best (at least in the US), due to the integral
>> encryption.
>
> Isn't encryption in ham banned everywhere?

I don't know, and didn't want to speak for everyone ;)

> What about configuring daemon to use TLS only to sign communication,
> not encrypt it?

I believe signatures are okay, as their intent is not to "obscure
meaning" of a transmitted message.

-- 
|_|O|_| 
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1  E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860