Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu>
Newsgroups: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:33:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <slrnvceq3c.55b.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>
References: <1724312020-7@cmacleod.me.uk>
 <slrnvcdrcn.55b.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>
 <va7iaf$2l4$7@pyrite.ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
 <slrnvcel7g.55b.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>
 <877cc88rju.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:33:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e06b27ef794faaa7f5a546bef3d4beac";
	logging-data="500731"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19w2gsQI0btVXeKZRO1M0HVyuEb4mfA224="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5cpRiCQ38VbIRRju5f6albBbaMw=
Bytes: 3222

On 2024-08-22, Russ Allbery <eagle@eyrie.org> wrote:
> Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes:
>> I've no idea. I haven't looked since the 1990s, when it was very rarely,
>> if ever, blocked.
>
> Hm, I'm not sure about that.  Blocking NEWNEWS in INN goes back a long
> time.  The old implementation did history text file searches, IIRC, and
> was rather inefficient for single groups if the server had a lot of
> traffic.  Maybe I'm misremembering, but I don't think I am; I'm pretty
> sure I disabled NEWNEWS on the servers I was running in the late 1990s.

It may perhaps be that you were not working at a UK dial-up ISP? :-)

At the time we sold an Internet connectivity package for Acorn RISC
computers, that included an off-line mail/newsreader whereby you
dialled up, fetched the new articles for your groups, then disconnected
(calls were charged by the minute, so you did not want to remain online
while reading/replying).

This obviously worked by using NEWNEWS, and I don't recall many
complaints about it not working, although looking back I may dimly
recollect one or two.

(I may perhaps be the only person in the world who's written both
a news server and a graphical web browser in assembly language.)

It may have helped that the UK ISP marked at the time was dominated
by Demon Internet, who pioneered the dial-up market, and as far as
I recall they used their own custom news server, which certainly
did support NEWNEWS efficiently enough for their purposes.

> The current implementation is quite efficient if the user specifies a
> single newsgroup, which is a common use case of NEWNEWS.  If they specify
> a wildmat that matches a bunch of groups, it's still fairly bad.
> NEWNEWS * has to search the overview of every group on the server for
> articles in the date range, so if you have a lot of groups, that is going
> to be painful.

I would expect that our software used NEWNEWS with specific group names.
It was a non-technical GUI interface so I don't think people will have
been interacting with it using patterns rather than ticking groups shown
on the screen.