Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!inka.de!mips.inka.de!.POSTED.localhost!not-for-mail
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,sci.lang
Subject: Re: Somewheres
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:36:03 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnvdha4j.6rm.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References: <vatljd$mjf9$1@dont-email.me>
 <pan$446ac$ba5dac04$67ebf9e0$47ac5644@gmail.com>
 <vb0a62$170hl$1@dont-email.me>
 <pan$6cdcd$a1e57e8a$8ebe27ea$32af951f@gmail.com>
 <f5140de8d161885842798961deb38a46@www.novabbs.com>
 <m31q2260rz.fsf@leonis4.robolove.meer.net> <vb4ejj$2rvka$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvdc5jt.ddb.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:36:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: lorvorc.mips.inka.de; posting-host="localhost:::1";
	logging-data="34234"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@mips.inka.de"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Bytes: 2585
Lines: 30

On 2024-09-02, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:

> Have you ever wondered why the third person plural present tense
> forms of Italian verbs are so strangely stressed, e.g., pàrlano
> instead of *parlàno?  And where is that -o from anyway?

So that was an example where something was added at the end of
words.  I don't intend this as an invalidation of the general
observation that there is a longtime trend of phonetic erosion, but
I want to show that actual language history is complex and circuitous.

Here's another one.  From the King James Version, you may be familiar
with the second person singular indicative ending -(e)st (-t in
some verbs), "thou thinkest" etc.  German also has -st across the
second person singular.  Clearly, -st is an old 2SG marker...

.... Except, Slavic has -š there.  Latin, not a language to drop final
-t, has -s.  Even Gothic has -s, and if you look at the variants
in early Old English and Old High German, the original 2SG ending
is also -s.

Where did the -t come from?  There are two hypotheses.  One, dismissed
by Ringe (and I'm skeptical as well), is from missegmentation when
the subject pronoun (tu ~ þu) followed the verb.  The other involves
the appearance of -s-t due to sound changes in some preterite-present
verbs, reanalysis as -st, and spread to other verbs.  Remarkably,
this appears to have happened independently in both English and
German.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de