Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: 5 Stand-Out LibreOffice Features That Make It My Go-To Office
 Suite
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 18:20:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <slrnvh598p.3g1s2.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <ven2a7$1tq34$1@dont-email.me>
 <rm5ugj5uttt0nrnfnji0f3ulsuko5880ck@4ax.com>
 <slrnvh0019.1vpfs.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <vepend$2e4fp$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:20:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ebc71d55264ad87d5dae4ee9d88f9fff";
	logging-data="3603226"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DBYAgBfbbk1oO32xa5FI+JtGrZp1pRDP5LqsaGlMKtQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/eVAwiGCoqRTMlj3mvXAzflPJ/I=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2352

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 22:29 this Wednesday (GMT):
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:10:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
>> Also, .docx and similar "compatibility" file formats.
>
> ISO 29500 (OOXML) is an absolute shambles of a “standard”, full of gaps 
> and contradictions. It supposedly defines a “transitional” mode and a 
> “strict” compliance mode, but even now, 20 years after the spec was 
> supposedly “standardized”, everybody is still afraid to use “strict” mode 
> because it might break too many things.
>
> If you want a standard document format, stick to ISO 26300 (ODF). It’s a 
> much smaller and simpler spec -- easier to understand, and easier to 
> verify that you are compliant with it.


Is ODT good too?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom