Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Distros Say: "Wayland." Distro Lackeys Say: "Yassah Massah."
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:40:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <slrnvj45dc.15th2.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <pan$90fc3$83c1d001$554e1484$353b6f3d@linux.rocks>
 <slrnvj2n9e.3jacf.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <pan$39f75$4c620d9c$63f1b0be$b540c7ba@linux.rocks>
 <2hk3jj5g5q3nvrfv97dn4ih44af1njh3he@4ax.com>
 <6731dd45$0$404$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <kpn3jjtrmrh5j6751tcs017ok6uj7c411c@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:40:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="19bc38fac71be5488d2bd13a76ac6d75";
	logging-data="1097214"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yKigD+m0Jqs9NUIPuor0bgX3YRxbBmWB1bUC1G/n3Hw=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rqfAFXLUU9iPIKcemXI0HICMnjE=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 3968

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 10:42 this Monday (GMT):
> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>Le 11-11-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>>>>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>>>>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>>>>
>>>>Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>>>>about backward compatibility?
>>>>
>>>>Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
>>>>your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
>>>>in the past.
>>>>
>>>>They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
>>>>the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
>>>>accept it all without protest.
>>>
>>> You ever think 
>>
>>No, he can't. That's obvious in any of his messages.
>>
>>> of simply choosing a distro that uses X?
>>
>>You mean installing something not installed by default by his distro?
>>No, he's a distro lackey.
>
>
> AFAICT, my Debian uses X by default.  I see nothing about Wayland.
> Larry apparently thinks all distros are alike, which he's partially
> right about, they're all superior to his ridiculous, lacking a modern
> browser, no DE, retardo setup.
>
>
>>> Your
>>> arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
>>> system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.
>>
>>There is nothing wrong with his system. The issue is with his way of
>>using it. He claims he's the best user when he's so slow that he
>>shouldn't brag about it. And the fact that he's relying heavily on a GUI
>>when he says that GUI are stupid is an issue too.
>>
>>But its look is only a matter of taste. If it looks ugly to you,  he is
>>the one to use it, so he has no reason to adapt it to your tastes. To
>>speak about something you'll understand, his way of choosing a theme for
>>his GUI is as valid as your way of choosing a partner with a dick. If
>>you claim about your right to have different tastes, you can't criticise
>>his tastes.
>
>
> I am not sure I'd compare his silly computer to sexual preferences ...


My debian install is running X11, too.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom