Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<slrnvmtf29.b7n.carlf@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::2!not-for-mail From: Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Project to train image generator (LORA?) on networked Pi Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:40:09 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <slrnvmtf29.b7n.carlf@panix2.panix.com> References: <slrnvmll5i.aj4.carlf@panix2.panix.com> <vkevr1$1vrev$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: carl@finknetwork.com Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:40:09 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::2"; logging-data="25479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (NetBSD) Bytes: 1504 Lines: 15 On 2024-12-24, Dennis <dennis@none.none> wrote: > There were some projects that used multiple PIs. From a cost and > complexity standpoint they were more "because we can" rather than > practical. A multicore AMD or INTEL processor would be a better option. > If you skip the high power GPU the system cost is lower. Also the MPI > cluster code is "off the shelf" for those processors. > > https://mpitutorial.com/tutorials/mpi-hello-world/ Thank you. -- Carl Fink carl@finknetwork.com https://reasonablyliterate.com https://nitpicking.com If you want to make a point, somebody will take the point and stab you with it. -Kenne Estes