Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: What Have You Been Playing... In December 2024?
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 01:00:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <slrnvnedin.3t0r3.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <b1qanjph08qmpcbahfejf124kmaq7o87sc@4ax.com>
 <slrnvnbacs.1iro2.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <2ihbnj5v6fepqs18fg8e36c2i5vbifgn8g@4ax.com> <vl5h8p$38asp$1@dont-email.me>
 <rtadnjh2dp5c8khd4cn8qam3pt8tlud4c6@4ax.com>
 <LKSdnUPSUO3lI-v6nZ2dnZfqn_XQpa_W@earthlink.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 02:00:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="62d2a36b8bd74509f933f275e9f078f6";
	logging-data="3774957"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XfJHHj6J7NYGWdPfWjvcVwaCfqRB5yDVULt8ac0ZgqA=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u8VC/QYb+gcRiOB8eOZuQ6+Uo+A=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2927

Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote at 16:27 this Thursday (GMT):
> Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:03:34 +0000, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
>
>> >On 01/01/2025 23:04, Zaghadka wrote:
>> >> However, I would like to reintroduce the group to the concept of
>> >> "[snip]." We all have access to Spalls' full post. Unless you are
>> >> specifically responding to a part of it, in-line, it's gentle and kind to
>> >> [snip] stuff that everyone has access to in the first place.
>> >> 
>> >> Sorry, not sorry, to be netiquette nanny, but leaving 253 lines of Spalls
>> >> untouched to reply with 3 is a little beyond. Used to be we did this to
>> >> conserve server space and extend retention, but it also averts repetitive
>> >> strain injuries from rolling the mouse wheel. I have arthritis.
>> >> 
>> >> I'd almost rather people top-post...
>> >
>> >I tend to try and leave in enough context so that someone can see what 
>> >I'm actually responding to especially if a post makes multiple points. 
>> >That can save having to reread an entire post just to see what I'm on about.
>> >
>> >I do agree though, scrolling through a few pages of text to get to 
>> >"That's a good point." isn't overly helpful.
>
>> Me too!
>
>
>> spalls@aol.com
>
> AOL?!?!?!


Yeah, it's still around, for some reason.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom