| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrnvrn2nh.2rk.Adison@localhost.localdomain> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:54:09 -0000 (UTC) Organization: openSUSE 15.6 Lines: 101 Message-ID: <slrnvrn2nh.2rk.Adison@localhost.localdomain> References: <57dirjd2d86deu7t128gtllf4c84ld1p8g@4ax.com> <mvdjrjdjr5kdaht539eib86l4rp4g122vo@4ax.com> <f1vjrjda3bjinvk95eriko15qh4b6sar75@4ax.com> <slrnvrk20u.2jv.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <tddkrj9i0dqr3bucv9afkl1qa8pis2au8a@4ax.com> <slrnvrkg10.2ka.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <g0hkrjtk6aatgqtoaa26sjo4n9ftubpjsm@4ax.com> <slrnvrm8oq.2sq.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <iotmrjpsg4q54mn51l14p6n1emkpt8ljop@4ax.com> <slrnvrn25p.2rk.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <662nrjdfankavfplgh7am434t3u352m747@4ax.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:54:11 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="924e43aafdac1312ee0ad46ebc5e1e33"; logging-data="693066"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UGWqYzmCrazrrO/dSq9Lm" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ge4nbC5jh/tm7DMDR3KJn9KX0n0= Bytes: 5585 On 2025-02-23, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I [Joel W. Crump] promoted Win7 here [COLA], in the past [2009-2010], [...] because at the >>>>>>>>> time it really did represent something new and improved in computing. >>>>>>>>> Today, Linux is hands-down the winner. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Linux is the winner? >>>>>>>>At what? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If it makes no difference which platform one is using, then Linux is >>>>>>> the winner by default. That became true before the release of >>>>>>> Windows 11. >>>>>> >>>>>>That kinda makes no sense. >>>>>>If the OS makes no diffence to the user, that it's a tie, or a >>>>>>non-issue. A no-win situation. >>>>> >>>>> A tie makes the elegant and free Linux the obvious winner. >>>> >>>>A tie is a no-win situation. >>>>For you and your situation, Linux is better. >>>>Not sure what elegance you see... visually, Windows "looks" better. >>> >>> Wrong. >> >>Then explain how Linux is the winner? >>What's it winning? >> >>If Russia nuked New York, they'd only kill 5 Linux users. >>Not counting Android, we're talking PC's. > > > Windows 11 has a pretty layout but so does Cinnamon. > > >>>>>>>>I run Linux on this Thinkpad Yoga 14 because Windows 11 won't run on it, >>>>>>>>and Windows 10 is dead soon. So in that case Linux is better. >>>>>>>>This laptop can be folded into a tablet, and I can tell you that under >>>>>>>>Win 10, worked a charm. Under Linux, screen orientation doesn't work, >>>>>>>>virtual keyboard doesn't work. I only get a virtual keyboard at the >>>>>>>>logon screen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On a 15" Alienware laptop, it's had Windows 11 on it for 3+ years. >>>>>>>>Runs great, has never blue screened, locked up, refused to do my >>>>>>>>bidding. Some Windows updates have broken the Dell Support App and the >>>>>>>>Alienware Command Center, but a fix usually comes from MS or Dell, or a >>>>>>>>Revo uninstall/reinstall fixes it. I wouldn't even bother putting Linux >>>>>>>>on the Alienware, as I doubt selecting which video card I want is an >>>>>>>>option under Linux, and I doubt fan control would be as easy under Linux >>>>>>>>as it is with Windows 11. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Windows 11 is a computing tool. >>>>>>>>Linux is a computing tool. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The choices being available is the winner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Win11 is OK on hardware that handles it. Win10 is still OK on a good >>>>>>> bit of other hardware and on the same hardware for people who don't >>>>>>> want 11. I guess the $30 charge would be fair except I did >>>>>>> voluntarily pay again in 2021, $200, so my upgrade to 11 was >>>>>>> immediate. Why can't I freely choose between 11 and 10, on this >>>>>>> device, during the extended-security-update-availability period? >>>>>> >>>>>>Microsoft I would think have no financial gain to support the OS past >>>>>>the 7 years or whatever time period they choose. I wouldn't do free work >>>>>>7 years after I did the initial work, I'd want money :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Whether these changes, updates, upgrades are of value to the user is up >>>>>>to the user. If one prefers free, pay once forever, want the computer to >>>>>>last 15 years, Linux would likely be the only choice. >>>>>> >>>>>>But if one just has to have MS Office, or some tax software, or some >>>>>>device integration that only Windows provides, that's what they'll use. >>>>>>The usual preference is that the computer came with the OS, meaning no >>>>>>preference. >>>>> >>>>> I don't like Apple macOS - but it is as good as Windows and Linux. >>>>> >>>>> If you see where I'm going with this. >>>> >>>>I do. >>>>You have an opinion. >>>>Yay. >>> >>> No, an observation. >> >>Other than on your computer, what observations lead you to believe Linux >>is winning? >> >>Capturing me as a new user doesn't count. >>I'm part time, yet to be seized by the rapture. > > > It's not even contestable, Linux wins because it isn't the behemoth. I knew it was just the company. I don't like WalMart, but I will secretly shop there ;) -- End Transmission