| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrnvtfj2r.ff5u.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:16:30 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 142 Message-ID: <slrnvtfj2r.ff5u.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> References: <HVGzP.307463$SZca.169785@fx13.iad> <vqppl8$3k83k$1@paganini.bofh.team> <Qc_zP.407960$eNx6.112480@fx14.iad> <slrnvt4ste.9e6q.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <urAAP.729381$eNx6.423722@fx14.iad> <slrnvt7j83.a9cj.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <slrnvt8ont.all2.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <z4_AP.150986$sbY2.109507@fx40.iad> <slrnvta7sc.bo5s.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <ameBP.421505$zz8b.402216@fx09.iad> <slrnvtcouv.d0tu.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <7_zBP.388592$gmf6.386236@fx45.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:16:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2282f9ec45f79aac6590d4f220d89c4"; logging-data="3812001"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/aKukVuIM8cva0lvWXQPRq" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+hve8kCAKRAyNBI0fJHVXddpR/o= Bytes: 9393 On 2025-03-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-03-16 1:38 a.m., RonB wrote: >> On 2025-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-03-15 2:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-03-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 3/14/25 13:10, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-03-14, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-03-13, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/13/25 01:56, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-11, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/11/25 12:47, Dr No wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 19:17, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >>>>>>>>>>>> as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >>>>>>>>>>>> puberty blockers quickly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can now send your children and get free sex change all paid for by >>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now go and fuck off, you Canadian bastard. 51st American state will get >>>>>>>>>>> a new governor by the name of Mark Carney who is not a politician, let >>>>>>>>>>> alone not an elected MP. How daft Canadians can be!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree with that last part. The way the Liberals have mocked democratic >>>>>>>>>> values over the past decades is alarming. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It will be nice that Tradeua will be gone. (And Canada can quit being the >>>>>>>>> butt of the joke whenever their leader comes up). But Carney looks to be an >>>>>>>>> Epstein client. So, just another member of the Rothschild cabal replacing a >>>>>>>>> member of the Rosthschild cabal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep. In fact, Trudeau hand-picked Carney to be his successor and it >>>>>>>> looks like the leader vote a week ago was as fraudulent as the 2020 >>>>>>>> American election. 200,000 votes were disqualified and nobody from "The >>>>>>>> Party" can tell anyone why. Just trust them when they tell you that >>>>>>>> Carney got 85% or more of the vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry to hear that. In Romania the leading candidate can't even run. This >>>>>>> is called "democracy." >>>>>> >>>>>> On Carney from a Telegram Channel... >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark Carney: Trudeau’s Successor & Keeper of the Woke Purse Strings? >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark Carney’s biggest challenge won’t be fixing Canada’s crumbling >>>>>> economy, securing its borders, or even figuring out how to navigate U.S. >>>>>> tariffs under Trump 2.0. Nope. His real mission? Carrying the torch for >>>>>> Trudeau’s woke crusade, where “gender equality” isn’t about equal >>>>>> opportunity but rather a blank check for social engineering on a global >>>>>> scale—to the tune of $11 billion. >>>>>> >>>>>> 🔹 Trudeau’s Gender Agenda: Over the past decade, Canada burned through >>>>>> billions funding “overseas gender initiatives,” lining the pockets of >>>>>> international NGOs while Canadians faced soaring inflation, housing >>>>>> crises, and skyrocketing debt. >>>>>> >>>>>> 🔹 Carney’s Next Move? Will he double down on Trudeau’s obsession with >>>>>> “gender empowerment” abroad, or will he dare to reverse course and put >>>>>> Canadian taxpayers before woke vanity projects? >>>>>> >>>>>> 🔹 Follow the Money: The Liberals aren’t just about “gender equity.” >>>>>> They’re about ideological capture. Their “progressive” policies always >>>>>> seem to end up as grants for well-connected activists, think tanks, and >>>>>> UN-backed slush funds—while working-class Canadians struggle to make ends >>>>>> meet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Carney was hand-picked for a reason. Not to fix Trudeau’s wreckage, but >>>>>> to keep the same neoliberal-globalist agenda alive. >>>>>> >>>>>> The woke mind virus has already cost Canada dearly. Will Carney be the >>>>>> one to finally pull the plug, or will he just keep feeding the beast? >>>>>> >>>>>> 🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, sorry. The Canadians need to clear out these Woke morons completely — >>>>>> probably would if they could have fair elections. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At this point, I would actually love for Trump to go ahead with the >>>>> threat and take the country over. I have no faith whatsoever in our >>>>> people's ability to elect competent representatives. >>>> >>>> When I lived in Montana in the 70s, there was a movement for Western Canada >>>> to break away from Eastern Canada. Too bad they didn't do it. >>> >>> The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent >>> offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on >>> it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly >>> because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export: >>> oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself. >> >> I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my favorite >> TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I actually >> worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a kid (late >> teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, they all got 40 >> hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were told anyhow). (This >> was in the early 70s.) > > This is why I don't believe the welfare system should even exist. If you > want to survive, work. If you don't want to, you are free to become a > burden to your family for as long as they can tolerate your parasitic > behaviour. The welfare system does little more than make able-bodied > people lazy and attract third-world parasites. > >>> Provinces Trump would definitely not want as part of the United States >>> are British Columbia (the cities are extremely woke even if the regions >>> are conservative), Ontario (their brand of conservatism resembles the >>> centre-left at best) and Quebec (there is no appeasing the French >>> Canadians). The others would probably benefit from being a part of the >>> United States. >> >> Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, Los >> Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country in >> British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and California). > > It's too bad that such beautiful land has to be ruined by progressives. > I fully believe that the people living in the regions outsides of big > cities are productive members of society. However, the cities themselves > attract lots of progressives who believe that being a barista is a > career. These people settle in large number inside of those cities and > their vote tends to neutralize that of hard-working suburbanites. The > result is that taxes increase as does crime, and life in general becomes > much worse for everyone. Californians see this in their high taxes, > dangerous, excrement-covered cities. The people of Oregon see the same > thing. Obviously, the people in British Columbia are feeling it too. > > Progressives should be forced to live in places like the Northwest > Territories where they are free to show us how progressive politics can > turn a barren wasteland into a utopia. They should be barred from > settling in places that are already beautiful since they do nothing more > than destroy them. There's some empty, alkaline desert land in Nevada just waiting for the Woke. They should be happy there. There's not much they can do to ruin the enverionment — it's pretty much already ruined. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien