| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrnvu0pus.2t7.Adison@localhost.localdomain> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 19:58:21 -0000 (UTC) Organization: openSUSE 15.6 Lines: 35 Message-ID: <slrnvu0pus.2t7.Adison@localhost.localdomain> References: <gq4rtj5go10o7t71f8jguh066iene2n5h8@4ax.com> <vrkfbr$27s7d$1@dont-email.me> <83hrtjhu6m99m4sr6p36m7qec5t0idldjj@4ax.com> <vrlhod$38sdl$4@dont-email.me> <1q7utjll1cabq3b1pim0522uk6c97e3emm@4ax.com> <vrn8ka$or5h$2@dont-email.me> <hqbutjh5ct4kjj078ur38vnr772kp76qei@4ax.com> <vrngfl$vd5q$1@dont-email.me> <ehhutjlft3b11qb7cd6rq8ed410hg41lom@4ax.com> <vrpccn$2ne97$1@dont-email.me> <eqj0uj9chev4rppjeupbs1vmmd57ul6mcs@4ax.com> <vrpo2a$32bif$1@dont-email.me> <vfp0ujd09ci2gfpo1tpuaqfv8p5lug6c06@4ax.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:58:21 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8791f9618f07125966c1f92f34c384be"; logging-data="3267596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191HUtc2BUadp8rhlw0lpCG" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:In8ztZ3OlafscEgU5tS3SNpK+zk= On 2025-03-23, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>>>> >>>>> They are running, dude. I'm an Internet presence. Deal with it. >>>> >>>> Sorry, don't buy it. Show the RAM processes usage page, not the Dock, >>>> for that claim. >>>> >>>> Similarly, even if it was true, to go identify just what the workflow is >>>> which actually needs to have 20+ diverse apps running concurrently. >>> >>> Do the math. >> >>I have. That's precisely why I'm asking for what possible workflow >>could require so many concurrent open Apps for one human to allegedly be >>rapidly swapping between. >> >>Workflows are subject to the Laws of Diminishing Returns. For any >>modern system with fast storage (eg, NVMe), the pretense of a >>productivity gains from leaving Apps resident in RAM has functionally >>ended for the Pareto Principle 80% portion. > > > My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various > functions. workflows not involving "work" are just flows, any tampon will do. -- End Transmission