| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrnvud1q5.2ce.jj@iridium.wf32df> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Voicemail without a call Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:25:57 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <slrnvud1q5.2ce.jj@iridium.wf32df> References: <MPG.424e12df2d8a17619903cd@news.individual.net> <m4kcb0F8nd4U1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.424f1f45e07e0ca19903cf@news.individual.net> <slrnvub498.8s9.jj@iridium.wf32df> <49idffv104js.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <vs62kg.17bk.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:25:57 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f292876c7cff876c04a501a2a5717836"; logging-data="2768316"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+OaDIh0KsCDgW+ITubYtcQg8Z2Itw1xk=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9cY05GvzXdCknvWeLMEITGIAqB8= Bytes: 2423 On 2025-03-28, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: > VanguardLH <V@nguard.lh> wrote: > [...] >> However, I tend to distrust texts since most do not identify the caller. >> I see "24530" as the caller. What the fuck is that? Personal callers >> usually show their phone number, so there's a match up to my Contacts >> list, but stupidly all those 2FA codes sent by a web site do NOT >> identify the web site sent them, and 2FA mining is a problem. Maybe I >> just did something, like renew a prescription at my pharmacy's web site, >> so a text from some garbage numbered sender that says it is from my >> pharmacy that arrives within 2 minutes of my action at their web site >> provides context for the text. However, context is not the same as >> identification. > > Hmm? Strange! Not that I get that many SMS messages for 2SV or > information, but the ones I get, always have a 'name' - for example an > airline - or a telephone number. > > Perhaps this no-name problem is US-specific? (I am in The > Netherlands.) My experience is same as yours - I always get a number - or if contacts the name). I'm in UK. > > But indeed, also for our pharmacy, it's a number, but it's always the > same number, so no problem. If I could be bothered, I could put the > number in my Contacts list. Problem solved. > > [...]