Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrnvud1q5.2ce.jj@iridium.wf32df>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Voicemail without a call
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:25:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <slrnvud1q5.2ce.jj@iridium.wf32df>
References: <MPG.424e12df2d8a17619903cd@news.individual.net>
 <m4kcb0F8nd4U1@mid.individual.net>
 <MPG.424f1f45e07e0ca19903cf@news.individual.net>
 <slrnvub498.8s9.jj@iridium.wf32df> <49idffv104js.dlg@v.nguard.lh>
 <vs62kg.17bk.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:25:57 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f292876c7cff876c04a501a2a5717836";
	logging-data="2768316"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+OaDIh0KsCDgW+ITubYtcQg8Z2Itw1xk="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9cY05GvzXdCknvWeLMEITGIAqB8=
Bytes: 2423

On 2025-03-28, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> VanguardLH <V@nguard.lh> wrote:
> [...]
>> However, I tend to distrust texts since most do not identify the caller.
>> I see "24530" as the caller.  What the fuck is that?  Personal callers
>> usually show their phone number, so there's a match up to my Contacts
>> list, but stupidly all those 2FA codes sent by a web site do NOT
>> identify the web site sent them, and 2FA mining is a problem.  Maybe I
>> just did something, like renew a prescription at my pharmacy's web site,
>> so a text from some garbage numbered sender that says it is from my
>> pharmacy that arrives within 2 minutes of my action at their web site
>> provides context for the text.  However, context is not the same as
>> identification.  
>
>   Hmm? Strange! Not that I get that many SMS messages for 2SV or
> information, but the ones I get, always have a 'name' - for example an
> airline - or a telephone number.
>
>   Perhaps this no-name problem is US-specific? (I am in The
> Netherlands.)

My experience is same as yours - I always get a number - or if contacts 
the name). I'm in UK.

>
>   But indeed, also for our pharmacy, it's a number, but it's always the
> same number, so no problem. If I could be bothered, I could put the
> number in my Contacts list. Problem solved.
>
> [...]