| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrnvvdgah.2rja1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject: Re: Why is Microsoft Smart App so damned retarded?
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 18:50:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <slrnvvdgah.2rja1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <bN0FP.1217024$zz8b.1133415@fx09.iad>
<vs2ahb$32fhn$1@dont-email.me> <Hf2FP.410737$d51.111431@fx46.iad>
<vs2lai$3fht4$1@dont-email.me> <DDbFP.1380699$SZca.584510@fx13.iad>
<vs3s4b$jeqd$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 20:50:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fb83bbf962155875f76104b4e6ea3ede";
logging-data="1309109"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FUGWVA994vSga2nFY3MBcMzYxjwIPIwBW2btaP1MSWQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MLo7PmToBqTyWHeTbL7rMmP1WSg=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
`~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2382
Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote at 15:50 this Thursday (GMT):
> On Thu, 3/27/2025 8:36 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>>
>> At the very least, Microsoft should have understood that both ArmouryCrate
>> (used by most ASUS hardware) and Samsung Magician (used by most Samsung SSDs)
>> are legitimate pieces of software and whitelisted them. The fact that even in
>> those cases it feels the need to "detect" whether they are good or bad is troubling.
>> For now, I feel better disabling the setting.
>
> Microsoft wants to remove *all* third party drivers. That's
> the long term intent. The "Vulnerable Driver Blocklist" is an
> interim solution, until they are in control of all the drivers.
>
> They want to own all of Ring 0.
> And you can have a portion of Ring 3 :-)
>
> Paul
While that would probably be bad, it woud at least prevent some god
awful anticheats and drm "solutions" from working. Maybe.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom