| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<slrnvvdvfb.3b8l4.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: 1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 20:48:55 EDT
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
Message-ID: <slrnvvdvfb.3b8l4.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <vla2t6$5g57$1@dont-email.me> <677999c5@news.ausics.net>
<677a2282$1@news.ausics.net> <20250105082258.0c55387a@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
<677a83c6$1@news.ausics.net> <20250105212436.52a5a78b@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
<677c94c5$1@news.ausics.net> <20250107210415.0c5f1753@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
<677d91cd@news.ausics.net>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6";
logging-data="11728"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6SxUXHe3cgY7Pd1RXlAk6mcccrg=
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to ngp@nan.users.panix.com
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical/policy queries to ngp-admin@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: FR DE DE
X-Spam-DCC: www.nova53.net: mailcrunch2.panix.com 1206; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=candycanearter07.nomail.afraid
Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eternal-september.org
Authentication-Results: name/38662622C6; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=candycanearter07.nomail.afraid
X-Original-Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 01:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
`~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19Rbae6KO0kWSfuhGdVj+fdZ61dWa9h59Rm50cetkRPMovEqGeQyW4QjWa4HezQGzY=
X-Auth: PGPMoose V2.0 PGP news.groups.proposals
iEYEARECAAYFAmf3FXcACgkQrPkQbuk9hdusoACgt8wX9+KNMYWgBAgGgbGTnhXZ
0g4AoLYx9c9dvxw6AS5cdwwYJnxdXnXy
=Sn7d
Bytes: 4267
Lines: 37
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote at 22:13 this Tuesday (GMT):
> Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
>> On 07.01.2025 10:18 Uhr noel wrote:
>>> On Sun, 05 Jan 2025 15:24:46 -0500, Marco Moock wrote:
>>> > On 05.01.2025 09:04 Uhr noel wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> If nobody is moderating the groups, why not unmoderate them
>>> >> instead of removing them, if they get use, fair enough, if not,
>>> >> there is no harm, no extra resources used other than a handful of
>>> >> bytes for a one line entry in active file which already has
>>> >> thousands of unmoderated groups that haven't been posted to in 10
>>> >> years anway.
>>> >
>>> > The group lists are full of unused groups and that makes finding
>>> > active groups much harder, so cleaning that up is always a good
>>> > idea. We are here to discuss which of the groups might be still
>>> > relevant and might be revived.
>>>
>>> an extra few hundred is hardly going to mater, especially when of the
>>> 53419 "Active" /cough/ groups here, I'd be betting 80% or greater are
>>> inactive, and have for many years.
>>
>> I advocate for deleting them. I sometimes go through group lists and
>> see groups with interesting topics, but all empty. Not a good user
>> experience, so a cleanup is always a good idea.
>
> Well there are things I haven't posted about because I couldn't
> find a vaguely relevant group. Cut back the groups and such people
> as me will become even less active, while others will start OT
> threads in unmoderated groups which can drive regulars away from
> the few groups that do still remain active.
You can always use the *.misc or *.talk newsgroup. It's not like there's
enough activity for it to derail any other threads :)
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom