Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<slrnvvqhmc.2eh69.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:40:04 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 16 Message-ID: <slrnvvqhmc.2eh69.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vsj1m8$1f8h2$1@dont-email.me> <vsj2l9$1j0as$1@dont-email.me> <vsjef3$1u4nk$1@dont-email.me> <vsjg6t$20pdb$1@dont-email.me> <vsjgjn$1v1n4$1@dont-email.me> <vsjk4k$24q5m$1@dont-email.me> <vsjlcp$230a5$1@dont-email.me> <vsni1v$291i3$5@dont-email.me> <slrnvv82gk.2aciv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vt1a7f$i5jd$1@dont-email.me> <vti36r$g4nu$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:40:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cce277ed09b267ceaa072741e3832c48"; logging-data="1889263"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TLAFPMFUV+8+zF1F5AlPAJYOj29sJnVf6S7bq6qjsxQ==" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NT67/3D433adrAQEwy2stENYOl4= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D Bytes: 2249 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 04:33 this Monday (GMT): > On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 21:49:02 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote: > >> A better unit is, IMO, a second resolution (which at least is a basic >> physical unit) and a separate integer for sub-seconds. > > I worked out that an integer of a little over 200 bits is sufficient to > represent the age of the known Universe in units of the Planck interval > (5.39e-44 seconds). Therefore, rounding to something more even, 256 bits > should be more than enough to measure any physically conceivable time down > to that resolution. The problem then becomes storing that size. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom