Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<stohwU8_tXR1lFqmbIJKGgksu_Q@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <stohwU8_tXR1lFqmbIJKGgksu_Q@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: how References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <LUy8jnMOftjltS3mdpX3WN5LLNg@jntp> <uvn1hl$1arkt$1@i2pn2.org> <FRTfqq_z2PHTFM_G-AaKQuOXTiQ@jntp> <uvpk8m$1doq3$1@i2pn2.org> <8nAwOP_dNTnKX2uwIwDAqJz8Sxo@jntp> <uvs7k8$1h01f$5@i2pn2.org> <5LBLnYAjUgXgTK4Y5LH6e8fCibw@jntp> <uvuiof$362p7$1@dont-email.me> <uvulr4$36plc$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: lhTz9G4kjQCgahuuRVEV0nPo53A JNTP-ThreadID: 4YLc1knY-8u5i_KQ0oWqy89D7aY JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=stohwU8_tXR1lFqmbIJKGgksu_Q@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Sat, 20 Apr 24 16:26:37 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="411700afb7b8328da2036d06eb2cf7416c98f7b6"; logging-data="2024-04-20T16:26:37Z/8824135"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2128 Lines: 16 Le 19/04/2024 à 22:57, Tom Bola a écrit : > Chris M. Thomasson schrieb: > >> Multiplying any natural number by two gives a natural number that is >> already in the set of all natural numbers. > > WM knows that definition but he doesn't ACCEPT it in his own math > since 30++ years (which he doesn't mention this difference) because > he feels that the used logic in today's mathematics is very wrong. I accept that, but it excludes the idea that ω follows upon all natural numbers with no gap in between. But this idea is what I presently investigate. Regards, WM