| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<struqjd0up33dp7peo9h8bavv380j43efc@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: "NASA to study "city-killer" asteroid as odds of hitting Earth go up" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:35:06 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 96 Message-ID: <struqjd0up33dp7peo9h8bavv380j43efc@4ax.com> References: <vogshq$216uq$1@dont-email.me> <7tkpqj96to3o6e4u9pvl2qdff07s5uoqqk@4ax.com> <fb10889b-2f0d-a84b-b153-f9e976ccb3f8@example.net> <608sqjle4440ka7d2tnb3b8n1hjam30skt@4ax.com> <vol9ii$af6$1@reader2.panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:35:08 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="022ded1d7b341e04247598ee9451b82b"; logging-data="3737365"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BpwAzmbrwZOb2hmEpI/4Lm6MPqAjUoM4=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:+BFupjErEVslsz9+xUJnBmvtMt0= Bytes: 4593 On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:19:14 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) wrote: >In article <608sqjle4440ka7d2tnb3b8n1hjam30skt@4ax.com>, >Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote: >>On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:31:04 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Paul S Person wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:28:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2/11/2025 5:12 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>>>>> "NASA to study "city-killer" asteroid as odds of hitting Earth go= up" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> = https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/nasa-to-study-city-killer- >>>>>>> asteroid-as-odds-of-hitting-earth-go-up/ar-AA1yLdde >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Astronomers are enlisting the help of NASA's James Webb Space >>Telescope to >>>>>>> study an asteroid that has a small chance of striking Earth less >>than eight >>>>>>> years from now. Characterized as a potential "city-killer," the = asteroid >>>>>>> was first detected in December and its odds of impacting our = planet have >>>>>>> increased slightly since then, according to the European Space = Agency." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> =93The space rock is formally named 2024 YR4. Scientists say it = currently >>>>>>> carries a 2% risk of making contact with Earth when it eventually= reaches >>>>>>> this part of the solar system on Dec. 22, 2032. Although the >>asteroid will >>>>>>> most likely pass by without issue, those tasked with monitoring = its >>>>>>> physical attributes and potential have shifted upward the >>probability of a >>>>>>> crash since 2024 YR4 was initially discovered.=94 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am I the only person who is suspicious of NASA crying wolf ? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see any wolf crying. They are refining their data to >>improve their >>>>>> accuracy. >>>>> >>>>> This would be my interpretation. Plenty of time left, they are = keeping an >>>>> eye on it. Will it hit? If not, no problem. If yes, where will it = hit? If >>>>> random ocean, no problem. If not random ocean, maybe little bit = problem. >>>> >>>> I suggest watching /Sudden Impact/ to get an idea of what a chunk of >>>> space rock hitting an ocean can do. >>>> >>> >>>I thought you smart enough not to assume random ocean meant 10 meters=20 >>>outside new york. >>> >>>Tsunami schnunami, we've dealth with that and survived. If we have a=20 >>>couple of years advance warning we're good to go. >> >>First, as has been pointed out to me, the film I meant to cite was >>/Deep Impact/. >> >>Second, it is not "10 meters off New York". >> >>Third, we had a year. We were /not/ good to go. >> >>But I have also read a post with actual figures in it, so apparently >>the film exaggerated things a bit. > >My numbers were for a dinky 8 MT impact, whereas Deep Impact involved >a rock the size of Everest. Whole different game. That's the one that hit the ocean, not the much larger planet-killer to come, right? So, what do the formulae show for the /Deep Impact/ ocean strike? >Although in retrospect, I'd expect more re-entering ejecta than DI >featured. The KT impact may have left little bits of charred dino- >saur on the Moon.=20 --=20 "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino, Who evil spoke of everyone but God, Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"