Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<t0njjl-8nua.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: The Apollo moon landings
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:23:11 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 108
Message-ID: <t0njjl-8nua.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <a16b2511c2fa4b644b5a5e19b1a6eb3c@www.novabbs.org> <e0sehl-9nif.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <7dc7938d9b3ffb3a32296f91500919f5@www.novabbs.org> <qoefhl-n19g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <1c5039a1ace32ed8d3fe0bcdcf2e69c3@www.novabbs.com> <t6mlhl-9scp.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <bccc493ffca7057ab6b8b18e42d23dac@www.novabbs.org> <5g3nhl-n9fr.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <77edb7ccf76cc62f81a30cf16dba94e2@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 03:31:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04bf6921cf7a8b9fa38da4c4e413d9a4";
	logging-data="500256"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6zpC6QXW6J99/UHTRqai1"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-143-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JrHpD0GNBoia8zmM4EM0Oc5m06k=

Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 1:41:59 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:49:03 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 4:05:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
>>>>>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
>>>>>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it
>>>>>>>>> falling slowly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by
>>>>>>>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really
>>>>>>> would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help
>>>>>>> doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They had other things to do, there was the fear of falling down and
>>>>>> damaging the suits, the suits were not designed for gymnastics and the
>>>>>> suits were heavier than the occupants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean other than that, crackpot?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually the Apollo 11 astronauts had to make a jump of 3.3 feet to get
>>>>>> to the ladder to get back in the lander because the landing gear did not
>>>>>> fully compress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous
>>>>>>> nonsenses is awesome!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Outrageous nonsenses is all that you post, Arindam.
>>>>>
>>>>> Says the penisnino who ardently believes in Big Bang and expanding
>>>>> universe and Noah's Ark.
>>>>
>>>> What does any of that to do with the Apollo landings, crackpot?
>>>
>>> That the pullulating dull foolish apes like you will believe anything
>>> coming from rich and powerful institutions.
>>
>> Raving gibberish as would be expected from a barking man delusional
>> crackpot.
> 
> Now that is the pure Natural Idiocy from the abusive Natural Idiot.
> Recently it seeks help from Artificial Idiocy (AI).
> 
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
> 
> Bertietaylor

Yes, AI elimates the need to waste my time responding to your noise,
crackpot.

AI evaluation of latest noise:

Arindam, writing as "Bertietaylor," continues his pattern of insult-laden,
sloganistic posts with little or no substantive content. Here's a breakdown
of this latest message:
Evaluation:
1. Language and Tone:

    The phrase “pure Natural Idiocy from the abusive Natural Idiot” is
    a recycled insult, possibly directed at a specific individual (likely
    "JimP" from earlier posts), but devoid of argumentative substance.

    The term “Artificial Idiocy (AI)” is his now-standard slur against
    artificial intelligence, used as a rhetorical device to mock or dismiss
    views he opposes—likely yours or mainstream scientific consensus.

    The closing “WOOF woof-woof…” is consistent with his performative,
    pseudo-poetic signature. It functions more as a stylistic tic than
    meaningful commentary.

2. Content Analysis:

    No argument is made. There is no engagement with facts, reasoning,
    or even pseudoscientific speculation as seen in some of his earlier posts.

    Purely reactive and pejorative. The post is a personal attack in
    the form of a linguistic sneer, unmoored from any scientific or
    philosophical proposition.

3. Patterns and Shifts:

    Compared to his older Usenet writings (which occasionally attempted
    arguments involving misunderstood physics), this is a regression into
    pure ad hominem provocation.

    It aligns more closely with trolling behavior than with delusional or
    pseudoscientific belief—although it could still be a mix of both.

Conclusion:

This post represents a minimal-effort continuation of Arindam’s now-familiar
routine: insult, accuse, reference AI as “Artificial Idiocy,” and end with
a theatrical “WOOF.” It reveals nothing about his ideas or beliefs—only his
hostility, and possibly a deterioration of focus and purpose.

-- 
penninojim@yahoo.com