Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<t4mrkj5hqsau01687topcrb7135v49ptkg@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john larkin <JL@gct.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation?
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:56:39 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <t4mrkj5hqsau01687topcrb7135v49ptkg@4ax.com>
References: <1r3ix4d.1yypjir8hoviuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vhv4k3$27kpu$2@dont-email.me> <vhvpl2$2ar1i$5@dont-email.me> <1r3jhb1.ks7h3uj4pk00N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vic61m$1a5ji$3@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org> <1r3sfq2.1p1qdnk1d8sh9wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <cvvo1lx4lu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <victje$1644r$1@dont-email.me> <v5sp1lxv75.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <k8frkjpafquuqm8dde4ptgcocog4kqvool@4ax.com> <klu02lxemc.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 16:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5d73daf68fc9993b9a096e0ba91381b7";
	logging-data="3601363"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6ZVc8VCK5aSS06x0u1Qtr"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OzvFNp8RukvAlS6MuSiOMoYMq3k=
Bytes: 3181

On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:00:36 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

>On 2024-12-02 15:00, john larkin wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 23:35:11 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
>> <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2024-11-29 18:32, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
>>>> On 11/29/24 15:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-11-29 15:22, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>>>>>> Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2024-11-24, Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>> the English and American "billion" was
>>>>>>>>> harmonised many years ago at one thousand million so there's no
>>>>>>>>> confusion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you give a reference for that?  I haven't found one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04440/
>>>>>>> SN04440.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you, that clarifies the situation.  The English Billion still
>>>>>> exists but in 1957 British Ministers were told to use the American
>>>>>> meaning as it was considered "International" by the then Prime Minister.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously it cannot be completely international if there are still
>>>>>> countries using it to mean Bi-million nowadays.
>>>>>
>>>>> And languages. Spanish, in Spain at least, a billion is a million
>>>>> million. So one has to be careful when translating.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All this abundantly demonstrates that we're better off using the
>>>> metric prefixes instead. It'll be next to impossible to make
>>>> politicians and finance accept that though...
>>>
>>> Right!
>>>
>>> Or notations like 5*10^9  or 5E9 (calculators did this. Do they still
>>> do? 5E9 is very simple)
>> 
>> 10^9 = 1e10 in some places.
>
>er...
>
>10^9 = 1e9

Except when it ain't.