| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<t7ivfl-ic1l.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:10:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <t7ivfl-ic1l.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me> <0001HW.2DDBAB6A0079A85A7000018E038F@news.eternal-september.org> <100ip67$2dmd4$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 02:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="be98824d07073190dde45abe000441ff";
logging-data="2619397"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mVkwF5nKXr+VHO/A/rEyW"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-140-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ofti+G/NL14xDMEZ8RgINIe9xig=
Bytes: 2439
x <x@x.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/25 11:09, David Dalton wrote:
>> On May 18, 2025, Julio Di Egidio wrote
>> (in article <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>> Why shouldn't we think of the Uncertainty Principle as just a statement
>>> about the limits of observation, rather than about something objective,
>>> especially as in causing some non-zero vacuum energy?
>>>
>>> Is there some experiment that settles "uncertainty" as something "really
>>> there"? In particular, I am not sure if the expansion of the Universe
>>> is such evidence, or rather a consequence of the theory.
>>>
>>> Thanks for any insight.
>>>
>>> -Julio
>>
>> You might want to try posting to the moderated group
>> sci.physics.research , which has some knowledgeable
>> readers.
>
> You know there is a lot to be said against censorship,
> but when it comes to how it is easier for people to just
> make stuff up rather than find out the truth (like no
> red shift of galaxies) then I guess I could look (maybe
> it is impossible to post there).
>
> Basic question, is there some way to tell whether a
> usenet group is moderated or not moderated?
https://www.harley.com/usenet/master-list/index.html
Search for "physics moderated".
>
> Something like 'sci.physics.research' does not seem
> to say much to me like 'I am a moderated usenet group'.
>
>
>
--
penninojim@yahoo.com