Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <tWhBPYxzcpQ_KiKcDjetZy8dp_4@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: I have explained, for a long time already...
References: <dOQmXsQLGyowESGfWFCIim7ziXA@jntp> <ee010c6d-a8ca-48c6-a475-507649f1a3e0@att.net>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: xtOnguqeS9v1M0700kikmsnJIsI
JNTP-ThreadID: woGKnPSyQhwzs47XWVKucHK7R6s
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=tWhBPYxzcpQ_KiKcDjetZy8dp_4@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 25 01:23:17 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-02-23T01:23:17Z/9218739"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>

Le 23/02/2025 à 01:59, Jim Burns a écrit :
> You have proven that Einstein's ideas
> were never accepted. That seems to be
> more than a little in disagreement with
> the world around us.
> 
> By the way, Einstein had a thorough understanding
> of Newtonian physics. He had listened to his teachers.
> 
> I am reminded of the fox in Aesop's fable,
> who could not reach the grapes he saw and wanted.
> Because he could not reach them,
> he decided that they weren't worth reaching.

I like parables and allegories.
Except that here, the allegory is rather poorly done.
Doctor Richard Hachel is not a fox who looks at grapes,
and who, not being able to reach them, says that they are not good.
He is an eagle who, having seen them from afar, tasted them for forty 
years, and who says: "There are excellent vines in this vineyard, but 
there are rotten vines, I know it, I have tasted them".
You do not seem to understand (but it is a general rule) that I never 
attack an idea without having first understood that there was a problem 
with it.
All the rest is just the arrogance of my opponents who criticize my ideas 
without having first heard them.

R.H.