Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<tdepfj9u26go0ler2gdvgpjivanc5uoibd@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Another In The Long Line Of Dimdows Patches Causing Further Problems
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 23:11:19 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <tdepfj9u26go0ler2gdvgpjivanc5uoibd@4ax.com>
References: <vdid4l$3380h$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 05:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04a2b2bb303c57edbe748537d8bd5873";
	logging-data="3256612"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+USjMXrCS8ZURlxElDxWdkh38g+4cDQzo="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:D4lOOeC66NQvmZ+f9GYoz9T/LdA=
OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2063

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

>This is happening with practically every Windows update now, where the
>patches keep adding new bugs to the system. And not minor bugs, but
>major ones.
>
><https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-users-beware-a-recent-update-has-been-causing-constant-reboots/>
>
>Microsoft simply isn’t investing as much in Windows QA as it used to.
>That’s a sign that the return from investment in Windows development
>isn’t there any more.


Win11 has Copilot, though, so there's that.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.