| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<tevvmj92chi3grbmt0mfu427bkh7te6o93@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Top three reasons for optimism about the ID scam Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 13:33:45 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <tevvmj92chi3grbmt0mfu427bkh7te6o93@4ax.com> References: <h248ljhr4e20lqkkqgl9kdpq95d6id33aa@4ax.com> <vj259m$38mpe$2@dont-email.me> <a93blj1hkdbuqcikt03lnravufloj3qol8@4ax.com> <vj4ofo$3uroq$1@dont-email.me> <ae1elj1aqlctpvuls9kekqo7ldir21ram7@4ax.com> <vj7ihd$ic2c$1@dont-email.me> <hhrfljhbhokk8mmgjcoiirsskeclpp47cc@4ax.com> <vj9sth$127ja$1@dont-email.me> <soplljdpvuhjjg5e69kvq2ss2taju8h7vc@4ax.com> <vjevec$2r36t$1@dont-email.me> <1n7mljpp33onhujtgp4ltrarl60ejthc4r@4ax.com> <vkkgj1$3558d$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="76830"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:0FlXuvhzjF3BhvaO54+aK6RDX3U= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id DA4A6229782; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 08:33:58 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE0B229765 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 08:33:56 -0500 (EST) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 4BSDXn5k4072506 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:33:49 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C025FD57 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/E4C025FD57; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id B880EDC01A9; Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:33:47 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:33:47 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18aTqRHQBq8xlRACns6hM9FDN4H1Au3Fqc= HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org I'm not going to repost all the crap you keep reposting as if that is going to somehow make it better. In particular, you keep reposting the charge against Galileo and the sentence he was given. It beats me why you keep doing that. Galileo was charged with heresy and found guilty of it, nobody is arguing that. The point is that it was a *trumped-up charge* because heliocentrism was never a heresy. The Catholic Church itself has admitted that and I have given you cites for several esteemed historians outside of the Church who have thoroughly investigated the affair and come to the same conclusion. You have not found a single recognised authority who says otherwise. All you could come up with was a largely unknown attorney who is a geocentrist and self-appointed apostate for the Catholic Church even though he has no known scientific, historic or theological qualifications. You thought you had found a second site supporting you but that site completely contradicts you, stating unequivocally that heliocentrism being a heresy is a total myth. You accuse me of quote mining but is you who are doing that. You quote the charge against Galileo stated on that site as if it was supporting your argument; they only give it to show how wrong it was. You also try to make out that the New Advent article has been changed in some way. It hasn't, it is and always has been an exact copy of what was published in the Catholic Encyclopedia in 1907. If you remember it having something different about the Index then that is your faulty memory You also show a very poor grasp pf what heresy even means in the Catholic Church. Your try to make out that it was something done without the Pope's approval which simply can't happen; you also try to make it out to be a "minor" heresy or not a formal one; there are no such things. Something is either a heresy or it's not; trying to make out otherwise is the equivalent claiming a woman is only a little bit pregnant!