Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<tqbgmj9o58l29rqcgag4erommtf2q4f277@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect. Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:25:53 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 110 Message-ID: <tqbgmj9o58l29rqcgag4erommtf2q4f277@4ax.com> References: <cm60mjhbvhu5konplgv0mj5iu13s0m4g83@4ax.com> <vjpom7$17gl4$2@dont-email.me> <kmr2mj58bbl1s4onjf5a5n3b8thcu4dkok@4ax.com> <vjsahg$1qjmm$4@dont-email.me> <mtf5mjlb1bt0btrh12bgpu02olfu3u4g4q@4ax.com> <vjuqvo$11fs4$2@solani.org> <ad48mjpnhn7pqr9vvabui3j0kvo0dpccos@4ax.com> <vk1kt7$2uqie$3@dont-email.me> <jenamjpnj7gvl8kle6aprtb96bsgpt3jj0@4ax.com> <vk4cdp$3ifl6$5@dont-email.me> <35ndmj91mc14b2eumun869idcm3gc910lm@4ax.com> <vk6rbl$4akb$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:25:54 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab013fa5500f8823939672b16f0e23f1"; logging-data="721716"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19b7s0VApnTigUbGKX0QUVFMJwUqFNe7Bo=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:CPMP1SOAWBfatHlXeqG5bVTftN0= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241222-2, 12/22/2024), Outbound message X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 6137 On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:45:40 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >On 12/21/2024 10:20 AM, NoBody wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:18:31 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/20/2024 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:24:55 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/19/2024 7:29 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:50:15 -0800, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12/17/2024 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:40:22 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/16/2024 7:22 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 16:54:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> George Snuffalapogous had stated Mr. Trump (not President >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at that time) had been found guilty of "rape", when, well, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we all know the legal technicalities and definition and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific legal issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He did not say "guilty". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of >>>>>>>>>>>>> that rape by a jury. It's been affirmed by a judge. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The NBC Blue Network will pay $15 million to... his >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presidential library... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-abc-george-stephanopoulos-lawsuit-defamation-b2664508.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not buying what the judge wrote last year that the plaintiff proved >>>>>>>>>>>>> "rape" as commonly understood by the public even though no rape had >>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred using the legal definition of "rape". The jury was asked to >>>>>>>>>>>>> make a specific finding of "rape" and they said no. She still won the >>>>>>>>>>>>> case on other points even if not on that point. The judge was wrong to >>>>>>>>>>>>> second guess the jury here on the finding they made on a specific set of >>>>>>>>>>>>> facts. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From your cited article: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "�Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of that >>>>>>>>>>>> rape by a jury,� Stephonopoulos said on ABC�s This Week at the time. >>>>>>>>>>>> �It�s been affirmed by a judge.� >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Juries in New York found Trump liable for defaming and sexually >>>>>>>>>>>> abusing E Jean Carroll after he repeatedly called her a liar for >>>>>>>>>>>> speaking publicly about allegations that he assaulted her in the >>>>>>>>>>>> 1990s. Trump has appealed the nearly $90 million in judgments against >>>>>>>>>>>> him. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Last year, the judge overseeing those cases wrote that Carroll�s >>>>>>>>>>>> failure to �prove that she was �raped� within the meaning of the New >>>>>>>>>>>> York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr Trump >>>>>>>>>>>> �raped� her as many people commonly understand the word �rape.�� >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> �Indeed, as the evidence at trial ... makes clear, the jury found that >>>>>>>>>>>> Mr Trump in fact did exactly that,� US District Judge Lewis Kaplan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Honestly Trump has a case against the judge as well. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What redeeming aspect of Trump's character did George falsely besmirch? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you need the facts of ABC admitted lie explained to you, you're not >>>>>>>>>> worth the bytes it would take. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> End of story. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/ >>>>>> >>>>>> No one cares. He was charge and found not guilty. >>>>>> >>>>>> End of story. >>>>> >>>>> Well, you're right that not many care about the technical 'not guilty'. >>>> >>>> It's not technical. It's fact. Trying to spin otherwise is engaging >>>> in technicalities. >>> >>> It's a fact that NY law makes a misleading technical distinction. >>> >> >> Laughter. >> >> Go ahead and explain it for us. > >We think you don't really want an explanation. > It's your claim. If you can't explain it, then we all understand that you're lying.