Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=1ZVi7_<kL0:o:B7l=o;^c3HWonT5<]0T=djI?Uho:Xe;lL51CP6LDL<95GMl]75=81Og<^]<AIUC57@<I4Rf8bA1l3[[dIf;_m62Do^b@=QS77
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 20:19:56 -0400
Message-ID: <tusc5jllfskdpj5cknsk84mb5p66q0b0hc@4ax.com>
References: <9s645j1pehkhdkc7kjj3hbp2nnu93c4mfc@4ax.com> <66523fb2$0$1258345$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2u2cj$33vus$1@dont-email.me> <v2v9fr$3daer$4@dont-email.me> <v2vc53$3dkln$3@dont-email.me> <v30g0c$3lhel$3@dont-email.me> <slrnv5a4g0.8c8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v33c75$ddl1$4@dont-email.me> <slrnv5aeav.hse.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v33tqh$ftv1$1@dont-email.me> <uglb5jho4cn959nosc8di0lai52p4tftb6@4ax.com> <v35pqb$qao6$4@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 38
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1716941996 reader.netnews.com 2363141 127.0.0.1:59639
Bytes: 2661

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Tue, 28 May 2024 09:04:39 -0400, Joel wrote:
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 28 May 2024 01:55:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, because it's [WinXP] a good UI and some stuff still works..from what I
>>>> heard.
>>>
>>> Really?? That Fisher-Price toy-style UI was a “good UI”?
>> 
>> You could switch it to look mostly like Win2000.
>
>You’re admitting that an even older UI out of the 1990s was nicer-looking 
>than XP?


2000's UI was a bit enhanced over 9x, actually (Me adopted 2000's
look, being released almost a year later, despite being closer to 98
in design, not a version of NT at all, although it did have 2000's
TCP/IP code, the one better thing in it compared to 98).  The default
XP theme was glued on, resource-consuming, and pretty dumb looking, if
you ask me.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.