Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<u2d7fjlkkqhe2pp56kqfka1sjejluarvoh@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Linux advocacy Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:58:17 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <u2d7fjlkkqhe2pp56kqfka1sjejluarvoh@4ax.com> References: <llecmiFnttdU2@mid.individual.net> <1r0e7hp.bb6yp5z6dhnaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <vcvabp$3bcrt$7@dont-email.me> <7pb6fjh0mrcih3gahbk9onfesi9n0ngbff@4ax.com> <vcvil8$3co45$1@dont-email.me> <o1k6fj1r84geskevh0fk3ogkldg0h47fu6@4ax.com> <vd070h$3ina5$1@dont-email.me> <h9a7fjh219uc70slo1v2koi4pn2tjg4ct0@4ax.com> <vd0bpi$3jffe$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:58:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="03016e574599073a269fee6a809846ca"; logging-data="3787386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vvtdZOpdelcYyrI9Dqs+K45U3Bh0PzX4=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:yjB+HGActjIP7Hh5/15g8V6TDq4= OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 2121 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:16:36 -0400, Joel wrote: > >> And yet I'm accomplishing everything with openSUSE. It's almost like >> commercial OSes' advantages are an illusion ... > >But openSUSE *is* commercial. Vaguely, perhaps, but it didn't cost money. You're just obsessing over the word. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.