Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 03:37:01 +0000
Subject: Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <09faeda05cd56fb76cfbf943d2e35c5b@www.novabbs.com>
 <18094ecf59f56eeb$36$1185690$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <77270bb7b35acf61b40aadeb0028a26e@www.novabbs.com>
 <18097d2d1ea6c836$31$1179204$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <26ff17dc8420802f8c883012a3bba5b1@www.novabbs.com>
 <bd6cnT9NbbofkKD6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <d244798b9e74b58fa167100a58ffa6a6@www.novabbs.com>
 <18ScnR8GJ6-o0qD6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:37:03 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <18ScnR8GJ6-o0qD6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <ueacnVNjrZPAxKD6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-RYkbAojreLP41bgWGoUD+GaQuZxqCeYGbOoxihkO0Tj46xKdEZRdCWJ77Qiq5Z/gWHnADlieV9hVXwQ!CRZtJRH9D90r6VVGbVdz2ZcmwzG+7OL8pV0bHf4zRG2SDjpYjPi5nJclHHSsksrtCL8J66yxRa/G
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2714

On 11/19/2024 06:53 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 11/19/2024 03:39 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>> Ross: That's very terse of you! Get what shit out of where? The ether or
>> time dilation? One must have both or neither. One may want time dilation
>> for something else but the ether comes with it.
>
> Don't be coy, toy, get that useless shit out of here.
>
>

The theory of SR is a computable, successful theory
for some matters of complementary concerns in
electronics and radiation, according to a stack of
what's called "electron phyics", and GR is similarly
a computable, i.e. simplifying, successful theory
with regards to some complementary concerns
of station-keeping and a "severe abstraction" of
a "mechanical reduction", that's what there is to
it, so if you got problems with that, then the issues
are in "electron physics" and "the severe abstraction
of a mechanical reduction".

Then otherwise your fallacious rhetoric is shit.

Do you know why there's other than "electron physics"
and there's a better "severe abstraction of a mechanical
reduction"? Because relativity is just a theory, ....