| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<uobjt8.ajg.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: Abusive cancel
Date: 18 Jan 2024 15:33:54 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <uobjt8.ajg.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <umi5s2$3cnl5$1@news.usenet.ovh> <1TFclSG9uLUm8fvVngNACk2jZPE@jntp> <uo5m80$3in1k$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uo5sfj$b6b$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <uo6irm$1ik39$1@dont-email.me> <uo6m9g$b0f$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <uo6ne8$1jdm7$1@dont-email.me> <uo6np7$fmp$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <uo6p82$1jpq6$1@dont-email.me> <uo80r0$1v9f$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net> <uo86hc$2kr5g$1@news.usenet.ovh> <uo8uhg.9q4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <uo9ioj$30id$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net> <uo9nn9$2ovin$1@news.usenet.ovh>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Bf8TRC9A8wC131okJfxFlg4Q9g+8/fhLYw8RRE5fx+btcJje/U
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mstu2YNYV1KVdoTf66H2H6qBwNY= sha256:nvsE0jd+0EUJ6zrwHQlwS52L6IQz0epprOSyCFUpsDo=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 2557
llp <contact@usenet.ovh> wrote:
> Olivier Miakinen a émis l'idée suivante :
[...]
> Rather than dumping your lies on this group too,
> respond to the technical observations made or return to your sandbox.
>
> You don't seem to have understood how usenet works and why your desire
> to cancel messages cannot succeed outside of paganini.org and two other
> servers that seem to accept absolutely all cancels.
[Not taking sides in the behind-the-scenes quarrels:]
Indeed. As has been said many, many times in this thread, there is no,
absolutely no, excuse for these cancels and Olivier should stop
creating/sending them.
Only with approval of and in cooperation with paganini.org and the two
other servers, he/they could issue *local* cancel *commands* (not cancel
articles), but AFAICT, he does *not* have admin approval on the two
other servers and for paganini.org it is (AFAICT) a non-issue.
Anyway, this subject is no longer up for discussion, because all has
been said over and over and no amount of foot-stamping can/will change
this malpractice to become accepted practice.
And, as has been said umpteen times, don't cancel, but educate users
(and yourself) to use/create their killfiles/filters.