Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: cyclists attack auto driver
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 09:52:54 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <uphacj5gjf3gea972ifsevrb2mgq6l7sv9@4ax.com>
References: <v9u4bv$2is2s$3@dont-email.me> <nns5cjhvfa23vbjhongnv94u0bs1ags6tl@4ax.com> <gj06cj1kimofmc8u9kt250diqmchn1pf2d@4ax.com> <v9voo7$2tip9$4@dont-email.me> <omp6cj9hm1c9bh8l5a9dee0ps37siiqoa0@4ax.com> <bhn7cjldbqvv58f67m3pbo1fcvjdbphser@4ax.com> <va0tks$3793q$4@dont-email.me> <s3o8cjdesesc2mgr60t2t9rdjqrv12m2l8@4ax.com> <tnq8cjd26q686281q3kmkmbok4gkj9u2j7@4ax.com> <va2d5d$3e7nj$3@dont-email.me> <umh9cjtgvglaifjmebdqt50sdmvgl5o6sb@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 04:52:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3fa36510dbdff02bcf6c7820cf693af7";
	logging-data="3916352"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Zri6QYCjoeJ/SD21hRGmJc3X0hRQiIFc="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2s2QGgz4T+EE52tE7nc91E3ihC8=
Bytes: 3983

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:45:21 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:36:11 -0400, Frank Krygowski
><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>On 8/20/2024 7:09 AM, John B. wrote:
>>> 
>>> Does the term adroit come to mind here, as in Frankie is adroit at
>>> changing the terms to justify his ignorance?
>>> 
>>> The original of this 6 rounds in 1 minute  discussion was Frankie
>>> seeming assertion that 6 rounds a minute was probably all that was
>>> possible with common fire arms
>>Nope, that's a lie. Here's the direct quote of what I said:r
>>
>>"My bet is also that your family never owned a gun that could fire more 
>>than, say, six rounds in a minute. After all, that capability is 
>>essentially useless for almost all hunting."

Yup, you are correct and my only defense is your statement, "After
all, that capability is essentially useless for almost all hunting"
and I intemperate that to mean "seeming assertion that 6 rounds a
minute was probably all that was  possible with common fire arms". So
yes you are technically correct.
>>
>>Note I said "_more_ than six rounds" and you proudly bragged about being 
>>able to shoot only six.

Nope I said that I had no problem firing 6, assuming that any one with
any common sense would understand that if I exerted my self I might do
a bit more.
Does "Yes, I have no problem doing 12 mph on my bike" mean I can't go
any faster.

>>Note that I did not claim such guns were not common. I said I bet your 
>>family did not own one. That's not the same thing, John.
>>
>>And I said such capability was useless for almost all hunting.
>>
Yes you said it... So tell us Frankie, where did you get that idea? 
Have you made a survey of a substantial number of hunters" 

You have continually ridiculed people that shoot (along with black
pickups) and now are we to believe that you have made an in depth
study of how many shots they fire while hunting.

Or have you just made it up out of hot air?.
Which, I might add, appears to be your preferred type pf argument.



>>If you could have, you would by now have detailed shooting a family gun 
>>_more_ than six times in a minute, and doing so to take game while hunting.
>>But since you haven't mentioned it, we can conclude those have never 
>>happened. Just as I said.

Right... because I haven't mentioned it never happened? What a silly
remark as there so many things I've never mentioned. 
>
>I just cleaned an lubed the Bersa .380 and the Springfield 9mm. Now
>the house and my hands smell like gun oil. I hope it lasts a while.
-- 
Cheers,

John B.