Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <usea2c$1hofh$2@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usea2c$1hofh$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: We finally know exactly how H1(D,D) derives a different result
 than H(D,D)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 00:09:15 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <usea2c$1hofh$2@dont-email.me>
References: <usda7b$18hee$1@dont-email.me> <usdf9p$15934$2@i2pn2.org>
 <usdh1e$19t14$1@dont-email.me> <usdi0i$15ejn$1@i2pn2.org>
 <usdkf8$1aheg$1@dont-email.me> <use0kt$15q44$2@i2pn2.org>
 <use72e$1hb1j$1@dont-email.me> <use85c$167tc$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:09:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cbe692f823dc8310f00dd0aaf1f84978";
	logging-data="1630705"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CoFP6E+ey/ipEJEAH5Vcy"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AqMHkXJMoLTHaxU+9t73UXj6GTs=
In-Reply-To: <use85c$167tc$3@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2523

On 3/7/2024 11:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 3/7/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>> Olcott machines can compute the difference between H1(D,D) and H(D,D)
>> because Olcott machines can correctly determine whether or not they
>> themselves were called in recursive simulation.
>>
>> For H1(D,D) and H(D,D)it is the extra inputs of 00001422 and 00001522
>> For H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <H> and Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <Ĥ> the extra inputs are shown.
>>
>> When I keep repeating the above a few hundred more times
>> you will quit immediately forgetting that I ever said it.
> 
> All you have done is show why your H / H1 have been disqualified from 
> being Halt Deciders.

Not at all. Not in the least little bit.
I have proved that a slight reconfiguration of Turing machines
defines a machine that is exactly a Turing machine except can
always correctly determine whether or not itself is called in
recursive simulation.

> They are not Computations using only the description of the Computation 
> to be decided on.
> 
> This PROVES that they are not correct Halt Deciders.
> 
> And you are proved to be just a pathetic and pathological liar.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer