Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usekbt$1jk8m$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: A lot better than a Covid death shot!
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:05:01 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <usekbt$1jk8m$3@dont-email.me>
References: <ii4juitohro4svdn5d8auajn9bvvb9j7oj@4ax.com>
 <ns6cnUVBU4EWB3T4nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <usc974$11v8a$1@solani.org>
 <9fjjuid0i28o79c3nvlhuuao81ffqthv22@4ax.com> <uscl4a$13suf$1@dont-email.me>
 <usclep$13shm$1@dont-email.me> <uscllt$13taq$1@dont-email.me>
 <uscukk$15vjb$1@dont-email.me> <usedjj$1i92b$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:05:02 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dd4deb4cbe2ae2bc9e0b2dea043d3f41";
	logging-data="1691926"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3lRidLuZhUxQ6mF9+knpSDRYJfcbi7pI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CY+yq9JOsgc9+m8OPX2xS50IKZU=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <usedjj$1i92b$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3192

On 08/03/2024 07:09, Bill Sloman wrote:
> On 8/03/2024 4:48 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 07/03/2024 15:15, GB wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2024 15:11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 07/03/2024 15:05, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>> There's not a shred of evidence that Covid-19 was any kind of 
>>>>> laboratory-developed virus, and virus labs are actually pretty good 
>>>>> at keeping dangerous viruses safely locked up. It's a stupid idea, 
>>>>> but Cursitor Doom and Jan Panteltje like it.
>>>>
>>>> Actually its pretty much the main stream  consensus that the virus 
>>>> was cooked up in a lab, and escaped.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is that the consensus amongst people who really know what they are 
>>> talking about?
>>>
>>>
>> As far as I know, yes.
> 
> But you don't know much, and don't go to any trouble to find out 
> evidence that you'd prefer not to know about.
> 
>> https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/
>>
>> is a fairly good overview. The problem is that accusing China of being 
>> uber sloppy was not politically *convenient*. So the default position 
>> initially was a 'we just dont know'
>>
>> Apparently now, we know a lot more...
> 
> But you can't point to any of this "new: information.
> 
that site is the information dearie

https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/

Dont bully me. Take it up with them.


-- 
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow witted 
man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest 
thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly 
persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid 
before him."

    - Leo Tolstoy