Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<usekbt$1jk8m$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y Subject: Re: OT: A lot better than a Covid death shot! Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:05:01 +0000 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 50 Message-ID: <usekbt$1jk8m$3@dont-email.me> References: <ii4juitohro4svdn5d8auajn9bvvb9j7oj@4ax.com> <ns6cnUVBU4EWB3T4nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <usc974$11v8a$1@solani.org> <9fjjuid0i28o79c3nvlhuuao81ffqthv22@4ax.com> <uscl4a$13suf$1@dont-email.me> <usclep$13shm$1@dont-email.me> <uscllt$13taq$1@dont-email.me> <uscukk$15vjb$1@dont-email.me> <usedjj$1i92b$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:05:02 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dd4deb4cbe2ae2bc9e0b2dea043d3f41"; logging-data="1691926"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3lRidLuZhUxQ6mF9+knpSDRYJfcbi7pI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:CY+yq9JOsgc9+m8OPX2xS50IKZU= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <usedjj$1i92b$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3192 On 08/03/2024 07:09, Bill Sloman wrote: > On 8/03/2024 4:48 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 07/03/2024 15:15, GB wrote: >>> On 07/03/2024 15:11, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 07/03/2024 15:05, Bill Sloman wrote: >>>>> There's not a shred of evidence that Covid-19 was any kind of >>>>> laboratory-developed virus, and virus labs are actually pretty good >>>>> at keeping dangerous viruses safely locked up. It's a stupid idea, >>>>> but Cursitor Doom and Jan Panteltje like it. >>>> >>>> Actually its pretty much the main stream consensus that the virus >>>> was cooked up in a lab, and escaped. >>>> >>> >>> Is that the consensus amongst people who really know what they are >>> talking about? >>> >>> >> As far as I know, yes. > > But you don't know much, and don't go to any trouble to find out > evidence that you'd prefer not to know about. > >> https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/ >> >> is a fairly good overview. The problem is that accusing China of being >> uber sloppy was not politically *convenient*. So the default position >> initially was a 'we just dont know' >> >> Apparently now, we know a lot more... > > But you can't point to any of this "new: information. > that site is the information dearie https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/ Dont bully me. Take it up with them. -- "The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." - Leo Tolstoy