Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Dems Considering January-6ing Trump if He Wins Re-Election
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:55:12 -0500
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <usgc1g$1vp6f$7@dont-email.me>
References: <CN6dnWhne_Rx2nz4nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <fqu4ui9hjd3s0gj30dvavm43o627hqhir6@4ax.com> <us06cn$22qjs$3@dont-email.me>
 <dad7ui5g0j06hm9q02kl1qo5dl30ft16cg@4ax.com> <us0de7$24gfd$2@dont-email.me>
 <us0hju$s25b$1@solani.org>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 00:55:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="680b125beb5e3c92aee45ac7c92a6837";
	logging-data="2090191"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2Xh43nvGwPUU1jjWWyX+T"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Io8goj76kWHDPXzA1yb6bQfq4/8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <us0hju$s25b$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 3136

On 3/2/24 7:52 PM, suzeeq wrote:
> On 3/2/2024 3:40 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> Sat, 2 Mar 2024 21:40:39 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
>>
>>>>> . . .
>>
>>>> If the appeals end, then there's no further delay to the trials. This
>>>> isn't a waste of time but moves things ahead.
>>
>>> Except that if I'm remembering which case the judge said that there
>>> would be a 90 day period for the lawyers to prepare their case that
>>> now doesn't start until after the Supreme Court makes their decision.
>>> Which means if the court was to wait until near the end of the current
>>> term (June/July time period) the actual trial may not begin until
>>> after the election. Which is what Trump is pushing for in all of his
>>> cases.
>>
>> shawn, please stop saying this. If the Supreme Court wanted that kind of
>> delay, they'd simply have scheduled arguments for the following term.
>> That they scheduled arguments soon is a huge hint that their opinion
>> isn't going to be delayed till end of term. I don't think the trial will
>> be held beyond the election but beyond the convention.
>>
>> They can read the election calendar.
>>
> They could have taken it up 2 months ago, when it was first filed. But 
> they didn't.

Because this isn't about SCOTUS ruling.  It's all about delaying the 
cases until after the election.

SCOTUS is NEVER ruling that a president is a King. If Trump wins, 
they're obvious ruling doesn't matter.  All the cases go away.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0