Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usgoo4$255sp$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Motor Speed Control
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 15:31:49 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <usgoo4$255sp$6@dont-email.me>
References: <qak4ti1ncqfkmihf9dvfsh5fv16l505t9s@4ax.com>
 <us3u77$95n9$1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org> <us5vgf$3egni$4@dont-email.me>
 <us7puf$3te18$1@dont-email.me> <us8i7u$2673$1@dont-email.me>
 <usad4b$ibi5$1@dont-email.me> <usbeed$s81p$1@dont-email.me>
 <usc42q$104da$1@dont-email.me> <uschnp$135ah$1@dont-email.me>
 <usd767$17qpn$1@dont-email.me> <qf0luipimeqekgch0lh67241ilkvid9ip5@4ax.com>
 <usflfg$1rk9q$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 04:32:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8999cc58ca815e678928e469e899534b";
	logging-data="2267033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18oeepMJLCZBvCTOKPL9/7fSpcudKe5Cow="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qIxZAc8oVKqmEFBnZ5jI2Tnh08Q=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <usflfg$1rk9q$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2474

On 9/03/2024 5:30 am, KevinJ93 wrote:
> On 3/7/24 7:18 PM, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:13:59 -0800, KevinJ93 <kevin_es@whitedigs.com>
>> wrote:
>>
> ...
>>>
>>> Stepper motors are invariably of the reluctance type. With simple
>>> drivers they have a great deal of cogging, which is undesirable in a
>>> capstan drive motor.
>>
>> There are two types, PM and VR. PM steppers use bipolar coil drive and
>> have a strong unpowered detent. And can act as generators.
> 
> Yes, I was wrong.
> 
>> Both can microstep nicely, for smooth motion.
> 
> Given appropriate driving circuitry that would have been expensive and 
> power consuming in 1970.

Nonsense. The cheap way of making an approximation to a sine wave is 
pulse width modulation.

https://www.tinaja.com/glib/sinquest.pdf

That document is from 1997, but the idea has been around for a lot 
longer. I used it in 1975 - if not to make sine waves - and it is cheap 
and efficient. The "modified square wave" - which has no third harmonic 
content - is equally old.

<snip>

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney