Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:55:13 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <uske41$307ls$1@dont-email.me>
References: <82e2d1fd15fd454352adb508eec2872682647282.camel@gmail.com> <5ZydnXJIaM0nAXH4nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <usk4qd$2u9ko$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="358b827b9e20a75857a566c986cf61e9";
	logging-data="3153596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ck8LqmouAtqNL8Iibrns8"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/f55iUjbsZFM43bu99SIpiU5hYk=
Bytes: 1374

On 2024-03-10 11:16:28 +0000, WM said:

> On 09.03.2024 18:30, Mike Terry wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I agree that the chosen wording above is likely to confuse particulaly 
>> non-mathematicians.  That's why when mathematicians talk about infinite 
>> sets, they are careful to /define/ the phrases they use to describe 
>> them.
> 
> And they will not accept that their definition is misleading.

In mathematics that is not relevant.

-- 
Mikko